f1316 wrote: ↑30 Jul 2017, 16:28
Fairly odd reaction on here. If you race the entire distance with a steering issue and maintain a pace good enough to keep your rivals behind you (and yes, Alonso showed that if your pace delta is big enough you can overtake - even with a slower engine) then you've done a pretty good job and deserve a real sense of satisfaction.
That's just it though. You can tell me what you want, but IMO it was quite clear to me that Kimi wasn't allowed to pass Vettel. He was on the radio, practically begging the team to let him by and yet it felt like they were letting him out to dry for the Mercedes just to defend the win for Vettel at all costs. Given the issue that Vettel was nursing to the finish line, Kimi could have been way more aggressive and put on more pressure, yet we saw none of that.
Ferrari IMO are very interested in resigning with Vettel for next year and beyond. Kimi is dependant on Ferrari keeping him. Those are the realities of the dynamics at Ferrari. Kimi would and will do nothing to compromise that, I'm fairly confident, just as Bottas wouldn't dare do the same at Mercedes, given his contract extension is in the hands of Mercedes.
pramesi wrote:Bottas, however, worked hard since Saturday to get that third position and it may have been even more unfair should that be taken away by Lewis after their agreement. I say he deserved that podium as much as Kimi and Seb deserved theirs.
Yes and no. IMO that return favour expired the second Bottas showed he couldn't go the pace and fell back by over 5 seconds. There's nothing wrong with a team letting the "faster driver win the race". If he had stayed glued to Hamilton's rear until the closing laps, then yes, I agree, giving places back would be absolutely justifiable.
For a team, it's the worst thing to have your two drivers tangled up by each other because the one ahead is slower and holding up the quicker one. It gets worse, when the slower driver then tries to protect his position by driving defensively and further compromises the race for both cars. They gave Bottas more than a few laps to "speed up" and show that he could go the pace that was required. He didn't, he couldn't and quite frankly, the decision to swap positions came way too late. Once positions were swapped, Lewis demonstrated how much quicker he was and IMO that should have been the end of it. For Lewis to slow down by 5 seconds, practically stop at the side of the road (yes I am exaggerating) to wave his team-mate past IMO is apaling and the bigger farce here. IMO it's bordering humiliation as in "hey, thanks buddy, I had 20 laps to try and disappeared in the horizon, but no probs, I'll slow right down to enable you to stand on the podium. Very strong pace you had there mate, congrats for 3rd place".
Also, if Mercedes hadn't issued team-orders - who is to say with the pace that Hamilton had, that he wouldn't have been more aggressive towards his own team-mate, perhaps trying to push him into a mistake? He most likely wouldn't have prevailed, but Max closing in from behind, surely would have made it a fun tussle. So while we won't know how that would have paned out, I'm not certain Hamilton couldn't have ended up ahead with a legit overtake. Or who knows, both Mercedes drivers tangling with each other and we might have seen Max on the podium instead. Bottas 3rd place podium was anything but a given if there hadn't been team-orders.
At the end of the day, I respect the team for doing so (swapping back the positions), I respect Hamilton even more so for doing so, but it was pathetic none-the-less. A great demonstration of fair play and sportsmanship though, no doubt.