#aerogollumturbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
Well then that's really something to worry about... At least I hope they realize what parameters where changed to get this kind of reliability.Thunders wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 09:11Boullier said he doesn't know why it was a troublefree Day because the Wednesday Spec was exactly the same as the Tuesday Engine. Nakamura spoke about the Updates for Testing in General and that they have updated the MGU-H, so they were hoping it would be better reliability wise. Well it wasn't on Tuesday, but it was on Wednesday. Honda doesn't even know why so many MGU-H failures appeared in Bahrain. Hence Boulliers remark. I really don't know what would be contradicting there but i get that the Boullier haters grasp at every straw......
IndeedVasconia wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 07:51The weird thing is that Bullier says "we have no idea why we have had such a good day" while Honda implies that they may have solved the problems with their MUGH. What a coordinated team...Andres125sx wrote: ↑19 Apr 2017, 18:54According to Marca, McLaren has completed 81 laps on day2, improving their (Vandorne) qualy lap by two tenths, despite using soft tires!
I´ve not followed the tests and to me Marca is far from a reliable source as they´re gutter (that´s the reason I didn´t even mention their headline ), so if any of you have any further info, we McLaren fans are eager to get some positive news!
oh rubbish, you rarely get to the top of F1 with a customer engine, Mclaren did the right thing bringing Honda back into the sport - unfortunately Honda have made a lot of mistakes along the way ... however if they can eventually produce a competitive PU, then it all the pain will make the victories that much more satisfying for Mclaren.etusch wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 09:53I am sure Bullier does not want Honda. This is Dennis's project and he is not agree with Dennis about it. Now there is not Dennis and he feels very comfortable.
I am sure if there were Dennis Alo couldn't pull the car from race too. I like mclaren but I dont like Dennis too.
I am sorry if I cant explain my thought corectly. I like Honda and I like to see Honda in F1. I also think that that decision of Dennis had made were right decision and Honda also right choise. I just feel that Bullier does not think that waydjos wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 11:12oh rubbish, you rarely get to the top of F1 with a customer engine, Mclaren did the right thing bringing Honda back into the sport - unfortunately Honda have made a lot of mistakes along the way ... however if they can eventually produce a competitive PU, then it all the pain will make the victories that much more satisfying for Mclaren.etusch wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 09:53I am sure Bullier does not want Honda. This is Dennis's project and he is not agree with Dennis about it. Now there is not Dennis and he feels very comfortable.
I am sure if there were Dennis Alo couldn't pull the car from race too. I like mclaren but I dont like Dennis too.
I'd suggest Bullier is just frustrated as he's the guy who fronts the media to explain Honda's latest Charlie Foxtrot.etusch wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 11:16I am sorry if I cant explain my thought corectly. I like Honda and I like to see Honda in F1. I also think that that decision of Dennis had made were right decision and Honda also right choise. I just feel that Bullier does not think that waydjos wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 11:12oh rubbish, you rarely get to the top of F1 with a customer engine, Mclaren did the right thing bringing Honda back into the sport - unfortunately Honda have made a lot of mistakes along the way ... however if they can eventually produce a competitive PU, then it all the pain will make the victories that much more satisfying for Mclaren.etusch wrote: ↑20 Apr 2017, 09:53I am sure Bullier does not want Honda. This is Dennis's project and he is not agree with Dennis about it. Now there is not Dennis and he feels very comfortable.
I am sure if there were Dennis Alo couldn't pull the car from race too. I like mclaren but I dont like Dennis too.