I cant understand why he constantly feels the need to tell everyone how well his drivers are getting along. What exactly is he trying to achieve with that? If anything he might slowly but surely be causing new driver management issues, again."Give him three more races and he will be giving Lewis a real hard time.
"Lewis knows it and they are happy and joking about it. I hope as and when it becomes competitive between the drivers that the harmony keeps on," he added.![]()
I think I won the pool.=D> The closest guess to what you did.P_O_L wrote:Im a law student and we get taught to have heavy discussions and filter out the personal bile.
Thanks, P_O_L, you're very kind. I'll play along with you, sincerely. I did not say this before (I think): welcome to the forum.P_O_L wrote:Allright, il think about repackaging the message and play the mandolin while ill sum up dennis and mclarens shortfalls.
I'd have to disagree - Debating is essential to a lawyer. Being able to listen to the other sides arguments and rebuff them with more compelling arguments, including facts should be the bread and butter of a laywers life.P_O_L wrote:A debate in general isnt part of a lawyers life anyway. It is just to learn how to see what arguments others can bring and how convincing that could be for a judge.
P_O_L wrote:It keeps you from ranting away without substantiated argumentation wich can only be a benefit in al aspects of your life.
Heikki definitely seems to be a Maclaren type of guy.ben_watkins wrote:I'd have to disagree - Debating is essential to a lawyer. Being able to listen to the other sides arguments and rebuff them with more compelling arguments, including facts should be the bread and butter of a laywers life.P_O_L wrote:A debate in general isnt part of a lawyers life anyway. It is just to learn how to see what arguments others can bring and how convincing that could be for a judge.
P_O_L wrote:It keeps you from ranting away without substantiated argumentation wich can only be a benefit in al aspects of your life.![]()
That is possibly the best thing I've ever read of yours. Perhaps you should practice what you preach more often!
Back on topic.. We've all pretty much agreed, that the RD quote about Heikki was playground bitching.. But to be fair to Heikki, he does seem happier at McLaren.
Perhaps this is due to the team having had Mika in the team for so long, or the fact the team doctor is from Finland as well? Or perhaps it's because he's in a pretty fast car and he gets on well with his team mate on a personal level? Maybe it's down to the fact he's scoring points and made a good pass on Alonso in his first race for the team. Ok he messed up the pass by hitting the pit limiter..
But he bounced back and he was on the podium in his second race for the team and looked like he had a better setup on the car over the race weekend.
I think he'll have a good ding dong battle all season with the other teams as well as his team mate..
Lets see..you have criminal law where you defend your party against accusation and are not allowed to debate straight with the prosecutor...then you have all the fields in civil law where you also rarely go into a debate with your counterpart. You merely listen to the other partys defence and indeed, try to come up with arguments why justice should be found otherwise. Both cases are thus not the strict sense of a debate like politicians have or we at this forum. EDIT: i did some research and it seems the debate factor is much higher in your system than mine. Here the judge is the active part and guides the process. Common law the judge is much more passive. Nevertheless the goal is the same, to convince the judge, not your counterpart. EDITben_watkins wrote:
I'd have to disagree - Debating is essential to a lawyer. Being able to listen to the other sides arguments and rebuff them with more compelling arguments, including facts should be the bread and butter of a laywers life.
lolThat is possibly the best thing I've ever read of yours. Perhaps you should practice what you preach more often!
How's this for a start?P_O_L wrote:Why, you saw some unsubstantiated comments from me here? quote away!!
pling pling, im playing my mandolin..
Patently unprovable. I'd argue Ferrari have spouted as much PR crap in the five years as any other team.Its almost amusing people dont realise or want to see no other team fabricates their pr just as mclaren. Ferrari, ...none of them are selling so much bullshit as the grey and black team.
Really? Much of last year the debates were usually pretty evenly split with Ferrari advocates and McLaren appologists.the vodafone mclaren mercedes f1 technical forum.
Retired I think is the correct description. Calling it 'walking out' implies relationship problems etc which there were not (well, according to both parties).Mika walked out
I'm pretty sure the jury is out on that one. Mika's car/driving cost Schumy the world championship....during that Spa 98 race, where DC robbed shumi of a certain 3rd world championship
McLaren lead both the driver's and constructor's championships.Well done to BMW now that they have a better car than Mclaren.
I will second that, thanks Rob Wben_watkins wrote:Rob W
=D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D> =D>