I haven't been impressed with Vandoorne other than he keeps out of trouble on the track unlike other newcomers. People seem to rate Leclerc high. I'm curious if we'll see him in a Sauber next year.
I don’t think the (racing) drivers these days deliver so much feedback anymore. The whole design is much more scientific then trail and error these days. A good sim driver (where Ferrari stands out with a whole bunch of them) is where the real tinkering is done I guess.SR71 wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 16:59Isn't it possible that in a technical sport you might just want to keep one of the best development and feedback drivers around (kimi) in your car?
People attribute too much of Ferraris recent success to Vettel (who also works very hard from a technical and feedback point of view).
Ferrari is doing something they've failed to do with previous star drivers - move forward.
Why would they rock the boat from a technical side?
Both Red Bull drivers are gaining a reputation for weak feedback. Put a Ferrari young driver in the car is equally risky from a technical feedback perspective.
If you want your car to dominate Kimi is the guy you need giving feedback every weekend. Kimi has shown speed this year and the only way for that to be possible is the car is being developed to his preference - something Seb benefits from due to similar styles.
but what if VET retires after the title? O.o
yep, he's totally doing a Shuey + Barrichello / Massa. Cant say I blame him tho, from a selfish pov it makes sense. However if you look at RBR, they imo will be able to develop their car faster with two mega quick drivers - they are only being let down by the Renault PU atm or imo they'd be competing for wins every week.
Yeah it's a good strat if you were in his shoes. But you're also right about how two drivers pushing each other will make the car improve quicker and at least give them a big chance of bagging the wcc while also being exciting to watch.djos wrote: ↑23 Aug 2017, 01:36yep, he's totally doing a Shuey + Barrichello / Massa. Cant say I blame him tho, from a selfish pov it makes sense. However if you look at RBR, they imo will be able to develop their car faster with two mega quick drivers - they are only being let down by the Renault PU atm or imo they'd be competing for wins every week.
And that's why you are not in charge of an F1 team...RedNEO wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 16:39I'll take verstaphen in a Ferrari over this fake team harmony nonsense. This is f1 not friends.Zynerji wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 15:42Team harmony is priceless, and having 2 drivers with a shared development vision (that are also good friends off track) is most likely why Ferrari have resurged.
Why is anyone bothered by this? If I was Ferrari, I wouldn't change what is currently working either...
Because I'd pick the best drivers available?Zynerji wrote: ↑23 Aug 2017, 02:57And that's why you are not in charge of an F1 team...RedNEO wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 16:39I'll take verstaphen in a Ferrari over this fake team harmony nonsense. This is f1 not friends.Zynerji wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 15:42Team harmony is priceless, and having 2 drivers with a shared development vision (that are also good friends off track) is most likely why Ferrari have resurged.
Why is anyone bothered by this? If I was Ferrari, I wouldn't change what is currently working either...
I am not assuming that Vettel required anything.jonas_linder wrote: ↑22 Aug 2017, 15:01I think you are paying too large attention to the rumors that VET required RAI to sign a new contract.