If Sainz goes to Renault, I think TR will retain Kvyat because they would like to have at least one driver with some experience. If Sainz continues in TR Kvyat is out, for sure.
I have my doubts. The RBR talent pool looks quite barren to me. Both Mercedes and Ferrari seem to have more exciting talent in the junior categories.
What a load of rubbish.zeph wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 03:57To me, Alonso at Mercedes still makes sense. Reports of him poisoning team atmosphere are grossly exagerated. James Allison practically begged him to stay at Ferrari, and now he is at Mercedes.
Both Alonso and Hamilton have matured and I don't think s--t would blow up the way it did ten years ago.
I doubt it will happen, but man, wouldn't that make for a great championship?
Plus, all the teams know, when you don’t have a dominant car like in 1988, 2014 etc you’ll loose the championship if you don’t have a clear number one and two, Ferrari, McLaren and Williams all felt the pain.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 10:08What a load of rubbish.zeph wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 03:57To me, Alonso at Mercedes still makes sense. Reports of him poisoning team atmosphere are grossly exagerated. James Allison practically begged him to stay at Ferrari, and now he is at Mercedes.
Both Alonso and Hamilton have matured and I don't think s--t would blow up the way it did ten years ago.
I doubt it will happen, but man, wouldn't that make for a great championship?
When Alonso was at Ferrari, everything in the team became all about how the team could make him happy and give him a championship winning car. The exact same situation is prevalent at McLaren-Honda at the moment. While FA is a marvellous driver, probably one of the greatest ever, team spirit isn't his strong point. If you feel Alonso has matured, I really pity your judgement.
Who the hell is James Allison to retain drivers at Ferrari? He was a tech chief and it ended there. He couldn't offer contracts. Anyway, we have a great championship even now. Ferrari took a big step back in 2016 and it could have been very easy for someone like Vettel to throw his toys out of the pram. He didn't and always backed the team. I don't remember the team environment being so volatile even when Hamilton was being screwed by reliability in 2012 at McLaren.
Fact simply is that Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull are never offering a contract to Alonso again. There's simply a larger talent pool out there that's younger and easier to work with.
True. Plus the strange understeery setup: Once you build a car for Fernando he is outstanding against his teammate. The question is, how it hampers the team with a second driver alone or how it hurts the car itself.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 10:08What a load of rubbish.zeph wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 03:57To me, Alonso at Mercedes still makes sense. Reports of him poisoning team atmosphere are grossly exagerated. James Allison practically begged him to stay at Ferrari, and now he is at Mercedes.
Both Alonso and Hamilton have matured and I don't think s--t would blow up the way it did ten years ago.
I doubt it will happen, but man, wouldn't that make for a great championship?
When Alonso was at Ferrari, everything in the team became all about how the team could make him happy and give him a championship winning car. The exact same situation is prevalent at McLaren-Honda at the moment. While FA is a marvellous driver, probably one of the greatest ever, team spirit isn't his strong point. If you feel Alonso has matured, I really pity your judgement.
Who the hell is James Allison to retain drivers at Ferrari? He was a tech chief and it ended there. He couldn't offer contracts. Anyway, we have a great championship even now. Ferrari took a big step back in 2016 and it could have been very easy for someone like Vettel to throw his toys out of the pram. He didn't and always backed the team. I don't remember the team environment being so volatile even when Hamilton was being screwed by reliability in 2012 at McLaren.
Fact simply is that Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull are never offering a contract to Alonso again. There's simply a larger talent pool out there that's younger and easier to work with.
Good point.Jolle wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 10:23Plus, all the teams know, when you don’t have a dominant car like in 1988, 2014 etc you’ll loose the championship if you don’t have a clear number one and two, Ferrari, McLaren and Williams all felt the pain.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 10:08What a load of rubbish.zeph wrote: ↑04 Sep 2017, 03:57To me, Alonso at Mercedes still makes sense. Reports of him poisoning team atmosphere are grossly exagerated. James Allison practically begged him to stay at Ferrari, and now he is at Mercedes.
Both Alonso and Hamilton have matured and I don't think s--t would blow up the way it did ten years ago.
I doubt it will happen, but man, wouldn't that make for a great championship?
When Alonso was at Ferrari, everything in the team became all about how the team could make him happy and give him a championship winning car. The exact same situation is prevalent at McLaren-Honda at the moment. While FA is a marvellous driver, probably one of the greatest ever, team spirit isn't his strong point. If you feel Alonso has matured, I really pity your judgement.
Who the hell is James Allison to retain drivers at Ferrari? He was a tech chief and it ended there. He couldn't offer contracts. Anyway, we have a great championship even now. Ferrari took a big step back in 2016 and it could have been very easy for someone like Vettel to throw his toys out of the pram. He didn't and always backed the team. I don't remember the team environment being so volatile even when Hamilton was being screwed by reliability in 2012 at McLaren.
Fact simply is that Mercedes, Ferrari and Red Bull are never offering a contract to Alonso again. There's simply a larger talent pool out there that's younger and easier to work with.
At Mercedes now, bottas is doing an almost perfect job.
I think what drivers think or want isn't even that important. As you build your team it makes far more sense to invest in one star driver (Vettel, Hamilton, Alonso) for around 40 mln a year and then put a good steady driver next to him instead of shooting yourself in the foot to have two star drivers.
I would hire Ricciardo, he has the "bad" habit of defeating all his teammates and its an easy going guy, He should fit perfectly well in Ferrari. Verstappen´s mouth(alongside his father) would cause too many problems. Max would be better in Mercedes or McLaren. Those teams seem to handle better drivers with strong egos like Max.Jolle wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 15:32I think what drivers think or want isn't even that important. As you build your team it makes far more sense to invest in one star driver (Vettel, Hamilton, Alonso) for around 40 mln a year and then put a good steady driver next to him instead of shooting yourself in the foot to have two star drivers.
Don't forget, in the past, Rosberg was hired to be a good steady backup, not the star driver (hence the difference in pay) and way before then, Senna was hired by McLaren as a young driver, not to challenge Prost from the first season (as was Hamilton next to Alonso). In all those cases it was good for the spectators but not for the teams.
Bottas and Kimi both are on one year contracts to be flexible for when the next big one comes available to take over from Vettel/Hamilton (probably Verstappen at this moment)
Verstappen would be the guy to (in a few years time) take over from Hamilton or Vettel, not as their long term team mate. Then you’ll get Prost/Senna kind of blow upsVasconia wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 15:54I would hire Ricciardo, he has the "bad" habit of defeating all his teammates and its an easy going guy, He should fit perfectly well in Ferrari. Verstappen´s mouth(alongside his father) would cause too many problems. Max would be better in Mercedes or McLaren. Those teams seem to handle better drivers with strong egos like Max.Jolle wrote: ↑07 Sep 2017, 15:32I think what drivers think or want isn't even that important. As you build your team it makes far more sense to invest in one star driver (Vettel, Hamilton, Alonso) for around 40 mln a year and then put a good steady driver next to him instead of shooting yourself in the foot to have two star drivers.
Don't forget, in the past, Rosberg was hired to be a good steady backup, not the star driver (hence the difference in pay) and way before then, Senna was hired by McLaren as a young driver, not to challenge Prost from the first season (as was Hamilton next to Alonso). In all those cases it was good for the spectators but not for the teams.
Bottas and Kimi both are on one year contracts to be flexible for when the next big one comes available to take over from Vettel/Hamilton (probably Verstappen at this moment)
Indeed, I was just pointing out that Ricciardo is much better if you want to have two fast drivers without suffering a clash between them.
Vettel, Hamilton (and Alonso, Verstappen) are going to clash with whoever challenges them in the same car. It's one of the trades why they are where they are and not Bottas, Kimi or Button. If you want a team with either of them in it, you better make sure you've got a follower instead of a challenger next to them (like in the past Barichello, Berger, Heiki, Herbert, etc etc). Ricciardo will make Vettel uncomfortable. You don't pay 40mln a year to make it uncomfortable.