New T-wing with Aluminium support
Now this is exciting to see.
PC - Albert Fabrega
Looks Badass!!mitsmania wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 09:52New T-wing with Aluminium support
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqrPIBVYAAhJZF?format=jpg
Now this is exciting to see.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqqTWqXoAAq6UJ?format=jpg
PC - Albert Fabrega
So what's the point of all this little wings? Do they help to direct the airflow better to the rear wing?mitsmania wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 09:52New T-wing with Aluminium support
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqrPIBVYAAhJZF?format=jpg
Now this is exciting to see.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqqTWqXoAAq6UJ?format=jpg
PC - Albert Fabrega
It helps to direct flow into the rear wing, notice the winglets are directing the air downwards away from the center. It also helps stop the air from "leaking" onto the other side while the car turns into sharp corners improving entry speeds, which is quite abundant in Singapore.skoop wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 11:56So what's the point of all this little wings? Do they help to direct the airflow better to the rear wing?mitsmania wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 09:52New T-wing with Aluminium support
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqrPIBVYAAhJZF?format=jpg
Now this is exciting to see.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqqTWqXoAAq6UJ?format=jpg
PC - Albert Fabrega
PRobably similar in execution to the plate Williams has in that area. I believe it is used to prevent vortex creation at the top of the fin, which would primarily happen, and be undesirable, under yaw.
Gillette a new sponsor ?mitsmania wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 09:52New T-wing with Aluminium support
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DJqrPIBVYAAhJZF?format=jpg
PC - Albert Fabrega
Craig Scarborough said in tweet that,
I'm not sure what the point of that would be, certainly if you consider the cut-out in the rear wing flap that, I believe, every team runs.BloodLad91 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 13:27Craig Scarborough said in tweet that,
the fins should create a strong vortex pushing down on the rear wing.
The vortex collectively generated by fins on either side will pass underneath t- wing and onto rear wing, the midwing above airbox will help it by creating downwash.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 16:18I'm not sure what the point of that would be, certainly if you consider the cut-out in the rear wing flap that, I believe, every team runs.BloodLad91 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 13:27Craig Scarborough said in tweet that,
the fins should create a strong vortex pushing down on the rear wing.
Also, the T-wing would be in it's path, so if anything this vortex would affect the T-wing and not the rear wing.
And even if it would make a sharp downward turn, it would hit the rear wing pillar.
I don't think generating a vortex in this area would be beneficial for the rear wing, especially when this could be done closer to the rear wing.
Doubt that as it would need to travel a long way down, plus generate a large vortex(and not a strong one) that would be influenced by the low pressure zone of the T-wing.BloodLad91 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 16:30The vortex collectively generated by fins on either side will pass underneath t- wing and onto rear wing, the midwing above airbox will help it by creating downwash.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 16:18I'm not sure what the point of that would be, certainly if you consider the cut-out in the rear wing flap that, I believe, every team runs.
Also, the T-wing would be in it's path, so if anything this vortex would affect the T-wing and not the rear wing.
And even if it would make a sharp downward turn, it would hit the rear wing pillar.
I don't think generating a vortex in this area would be beneficial for the rear wing, especially when this could be done closer to the rear wing.
Well I'm not an expert by any stretch and can't help but only speculate, imo the fins arrangement will create vortex and like you said it won't (shouldn't) go through t-wing, it will go underneath t-wing arrangement whether it goes onto/underneath/over rear wing and how it will bring performance for that we have to wait for expert opinion or an article after race.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 19:07Doubt that as it would need to travel a long way down, plus generate a large vortex(and not a strong one) that would be influenced by the low pressure zone of the T-wing.BloodLad91 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 16:30The vortex collectively generated by fins on either side will pass underneath t- wing and onto rear wing, the midwing above airbox will help it by creating downwash.wesley123 wrote: ↑14 Sep 2017, 16:18I'm not sure what the point of that would be, certainly if you consider the cut-out in the rear wing flap that, I believe, every team runs.
Also, the T-wing would be in it's path, so if anything this vortex would affect the T-wing and not the rear wing.
And even if it would make a sharp downward turn, it would hit the rear wing pillar.
I don't think generating a vortex in this area would be beneficial for the rear wing, especially when this could be done closer to the rear wing.
There doesn't seem much point to actually generating a vortex there if you also consider the free area that allows the T-wing and that the rear wing is much bigger than only the center.