Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
But they have been very consistent on the topic of people cutting corners to overtake. Because every time its happened, the guy has been punished.
Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
This. Very bad PREdax wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:37
I’d say it is different. 2 years ago Max had a great overtake in Blanchimont. I count it as one of the great overtakes ever. I frequent that track and in 40 years I have not seen anyone do anything like that. Yet officially it would not count as an overtake as he left the track with all fours.
Similarly look at Trulli in Grand Hotel. One of the best moves. Pity he damaged his suspension. Or mansell in suzuka.
Anyone can cut a chicane. Riding the curb at the limit of of grip at a point where going off line is not faster, takes supreme confidence in the car as well as your own skill. That is what defines a racer, and should not be penalized.
Jos and Horner have a bad case of sour grapes and let their mouths/fingers run without thinking.Steven wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:46Jos Verstappen not really being the smart guy...
https://twitter.com/MaVic009/status/922204970937708544
Anyway, just for the record:
https://twitter.com/LukeZerbi/status/922206075591516161
...And Max just said an idiot who's got his number made the call. Oops!
But that's the problem. On corner A it's fine yet on corner B it's a penalty. It's BS as you agree.NathanOlder wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:43Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
But they have been very consistent on the topic of people cutting corners to overtake. Because every time its happened, the guy has been punished.
Wouldn't practice times take precedent if the qualy was abandoned because of force majeure ? I can't recall the last time this happened, but if it's in the rules ( I think it is) then it means it should be policed and regulated.ChrisDanger wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 08:46If you exceed track limits in qualifying they can remove your time.
If you exceed track limits in the race they can penalise you (give back place, +5 seconds, drive through, or whatever).
What are they going to do in free practice? Also, nothing counts in free practice, so what's the point of enforcing anything anyway?
I would imagine this is discussed in the driver's briefing, so they all know what's allowable.
Im fully in support of track limits being respected as i feel Vettel and Verstappen pushthe limits more than the rest.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:49But that's the problem. On corner A it's fine yet on corner B it's a penalty. It's BS as you agree.NathanOlder wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:43Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
But they have been very consistent on the topic of people cutting corners to overtake. Because every time its happened, the guy has been punished.
We either punish track limits or we don't. That's the crux of the problem.
It's far to loose to personal opinion and that leads to bias slipping in. I'm not saying it is here but we need to be black and white on rules instead of the selective rubbish we have now.
Ricciardo / Bottas? They were showing it post race numerous times. One time Bottas was off but came back and stuck along side and once the other way around.NathanOlder wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:43Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
But they have been very consistent on the topic of people cutting corners to overtake. Because every time its happened, the guy has been punished.
Track limits isn't the main issue. it's gaining an advantage over a competitor. If Max was following kimi and they both cut the corner, the fia would let it pass until they do it 3 times each.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:49But that's the problem. On corner A it's fine yet on corner B it's a penalty. It's BS as you agree.NathanOlder wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:43Yes they are inconsistent. Everyone knows that and its BS as you say
But they have been very consistent on the topic of people cutting corners to overtake. Because every time its happened, the guy has been punished.
We either punish track limits or we don't. That's the crux of the problem.
It's far to loose to personal opinion and that leads to bias slipping in. I'm not saying it is here but we need to be black and white on rules instead of the selective rubbish we have now.
I think they would start in championship order maybe ? Not sure actually.Shrieker wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 23:52Wouldn't practice times take precedent if the qualy was abandoned because of force majeure ? I can't recall the last time this happened, but if it's in the rules ( I think it is) then it means it should be policed and regulated.ChrisDanger wrote: ↑22 Oct 2017, 08:46If you exceed track limits in qualifying they can remove your time.
If you exceed track limits in the race they can penalise you (give back place, +5 seconds, drive through, or whatever).
What are they going to do in free practice? Also, nothing counts in free practice, so what's the point of enforcing anything anyway?
I would imagine this is discussed in the driver's briefing, so they all know what's allowable.