Like... on the centerline 100 mm in front of the rear wheel center line? Having a mandatory position for a sensor would be the least if the problems.Diesel wrote: ↑25 Oct 2017, 13:26Positioning the transponder in the center of the car is obvious, what I meant was if it's further towards the front, or back, or the car is longer that would change how a car "cuts" a corner. The transponders for timing are irrelevant to this discussion as it doesn't matter where in the car they are positioned as long as they don't change position during the lap! How do you determine if they "cut" using a transponder? Would you need something placed in the track? What if even after cutting the corner, and the reduced power for n seconds an advantage is still gained? Is it legal at that point? Also, what if you can cut the corner, get 30% less power but still block the guy behind and maintain the position?Jolle wrote: ↑24 Oct 2017, 15:41Very simpel. You put the transponder(s) on the centerline (all cars are max with anyway) and you give them 10cm extra space, to avoid discussions. They already have a lap time transponder, there is no discussion that we have to go back to hand clocked times?Diesel wrote: ↑24 Oct 2017, 13:23
What if the transponder fails? That driver then gets an advantage over everyone else. Cars are different shapes, where would the transponder be? Short cars might get an advantage etc. Terrible idea. There was nothing wrong with the decision other than it's unpopular.
And if it fails? There are many systems in F1, many transponders already, not really a ploblem.
It would suit F1, a technical sport, to find a technical solution instead of walls, traps, slippery surfaces or bumps. What we also don’t want is that the steward are giving all the drivers who go over the line 5s. This will cause mayhem for the viewers. “Driver A is in front of driver B but driver A has two 5 s penalties and driver B only one, but driver C already has 10, so he is actually behind them”
All other physical solutions also heighten risk. A wall speaks for itself of course, grass will make you loose control, skid. A skidding car (especially in a fight) is always bad. A car in a trap has to be taken out and is stationary while others are still on speed, etc etc.
An automatic slight reduce in power is no hazard (for cars, for motorbikes it’s another story), especially mid corner, where the throttle is closed anyway.
The transponders in the track could be simple passive magnatic style. The tech is very simple.
And for reference, blink the tail light double speed when activated.
With blocking, etc you already have the same thing, like Les Combes. You go over the rumble strips (with hurting your back!), dirty tires and come back on track with a speed disadvantage to the cars behind you. This way they don’t need the back-braking, car-destroying strips and cars won’t go flying (loosing traction/control, t-boned by the cars following)
It’s a digital gravel trap/rumblestip.
I even think it would improve racing because the risk of going off is just time, no damage. How many drivers complain about not able to push after a damaged floor?