I disagree.
We're definitely going way off-track in this thread now, but aren't the dedicated race threads largely non-technical (to the extent there were discussions on whether to just replace them with a chat window)?CBeck113 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2017, 11:09I am amazed that so much effort is being put into proving that this is not adequate for this forum, but hardly anyone bats an eye when crap like this is posted:
"I doubt it. However looking back at this thread, bearing in mind how Vettel dealt with the SC in Brazil and the fact we then had total silence on the Brazil thread from those blaming Hamilton for Baku on this one. Well I think the word one is looking for is hypocrisy from the said posters and Vettel.
This isn't me trolling BTW this is just me pointing it out."
If you want a technical forum (Nomen est omen), then you should be just as vocal for these posts. And to avoid any Vettel vs Hamilton bullsh*t discussion, this is about criticizing other forum users and came from the race thread...but has nothing to do with a technical discussion.
I also wonder that as the website logo looks like GPtechnical to me.
I know. I'm just about managing and yet if I do some overtime I'm in the higher tax bracket. I can't even think about being able to buy a house because of the high cost of renting and the large deposit I'd need.dans79 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 21:21I agree.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 18:31At the end of the day, it's Steven's garden and he makes the rules, but simpler rules are easier to follow and moderate. My position would be "no politics outside of F1" - the machinations between teams, the FIA, and Liberty are obviously politics that is expected on the site. Anything else isn't.
If we where allowed to talk about semi political topics such as this, as long as we don't make political statements or denigrate others, I know what I would do.
I would post my countries tax brackets and ask people to justify the dramatic percentage differences in the amounts payed out in taxes. I'd add it always shocks people how low the bar for the highest tax bracket actually is.
You may have missed that dans79 is in the USA, not U.K. The highest tax bracket he refers to is 39.6% and the shockingly low bar is variously $235k to $444k depending on marital status and arrangements.adrianjordan wrote: ↑17 Nov 2017, 22:52I know. I'm just about managing and yet if I do some overtime I'm in the higher tax bracket. I can't even think about being able to buy a house because of the high cost of renting and the large deposit I'd need.dans79 wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 21:21I agree.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑16 Nov 2017, 18:31At the end of the day, it's Steven's garden and he makes the rules, but simpler rules are easier to follow and moderate. My position would be "no politics outside of F1" - the machinations between teams, the FIA, and Liberty are obviously politics that is expected on the site. Anything else isn't.
If we where allowed to talk about semi political topics such as this, as long as we don't make political statements or denigrate others, I know what I would do.
I would post my countries tax brackets and ask people to justify the dramatic percentage differences in the amounts payed out in taxes. I'd add it always shocks people how low the bar for the highest tax bracket actually is.
Well, it is in general chat which is meant for non-technical topics relating to F1.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:32This thread has no technical value and should be locked. It is just as relevant as a thread on Lewis Hamilton's earings.
Tax code is very technical. Or, at least, obscurantist. Both applicable to F1.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:32This thread has no technical value and should be locked. It is just as relevant as a thread on Lewis Hamilton's earings.
Lewis private tax affairs are relevant to the FIA?? haha now that's pushing it!roon wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 23:10Tax code is very technical. Or, at least, obscurantist. Both applicable to F1.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:32This thread has no technical value and should be locked. It is just as relevant as a thread on Lewis Hamilton's earings.
Not Lewis in specific, but it would be for instance interesting what kind of structures FOM and Liberty have in place for tax optimisation.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 19:12Lewis private tax affairs are relevant to the FIA?? haha now that's pushing it!roon wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 23:10Tax code is very technical. Or, at least, obscurantist. Both applicable to F1.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑19 Nov 2017, 19:32This thread has no technical value and should be locked. It is just as relevant as a thread on Lewis Hamilton's earings.
So, Turbo. You are saying then that a thread on the metallurgy of Lewis Hamilton's earrings should be relevant to the technical side of Formula 1? because you know, engine metallurgy and all that...turbof1 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 19:40Not Lewis in specific, but it would be for instance interesting what kind of structures FOM and Liberty have in place for tax optimisation.PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑21 Nov 2017, 19:12Lewis private tax affairs are relevant to the FIA?? haha now that's pushing it!
And yeah, both the terms obscurance and technical are applicable for both F1 and tax structures.
I think from those viewpoints these are acceptable topics. We aren't world changers here, we are a group with a healthy obsession for things shrouded in mystery and complexity, getting satisfaction out of unraveling it.