Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
Mattchu
53
Joined: 07 Jul 2014, 19:37

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

dren wrote:
07 Dec 2017, 22:45
What's it called? I'll have to look it up.
"How to Build a Car" by Adrian Newey, it`s come down in price quite a bit...

https://www.amazon.co.uk/How-Build-Car- ... rian+Newey

p.s. Pm me if you wan`t an epub version...mods please remove if this is against any rules.

User avatar
garyjpaterson
20
Joined: 25 Oct 2016, 12:59

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

dren wrote:
07 Dec 2017, 22:45
garyjpaterson wrote:
07 Dec 2017, 17:25
Neweys book is hilarious regarding Ferrari - talks about 3-4 separate cases in his career where, upon finding out they cannot make it work properly, they ask for 'clarification' and get it banned.
What's it called? I'll have to look it up.
Adrian Newey's How to Build a Car. It an autobiography, but goes into some detail with some of the more interesting aspects of various cars he's been involved with.

User avatar
SectorOne
166
Joined: 26 May 2013, 09:51

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

Why does it have to be a choice between high-rake/short car vs low rake/long car?
Or does it?

Seems long car/high rake would net you the most DF?
"If the only thing keeping a person decent is the expectation of divine reward, then brother that person is a piece of sh*t"

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

SectorOne wrote:
25 Dec 2017, 13:55
Why does it have to be a choice between high-rake/short car vs low rake/long car?
Or does it?


Seems long car/high rake would net you the most DF?
It doesn't, take Force India's 2017 car for instance.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

SectorOne wrote:
25 Dec 2017, 13:55
Why does it have to be a choice between high-rake/short car vs low rake/long car?
Or does it?

Seems long car/high rake would net you the most DF?
One issue is keeping the air happy on a long car with high rake. The harder you work the air, the harder it is to keep it attached etc. There will be a sweet spot where length and rake give the best result. Likely that sweet spot is smaller on a long high rake car than a shorter high rake car.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Maritimer
Maritimer
19
Joined: 06 Sep 2017, 21:45
Location: Canada

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

Long wheelbase and high rake would give you the most peak downforce to be sure, but the car would end up being slower since your operating window would be so limited. Too much would have to go into controlling the airflow and the car would be even worse in traffic than this year's car was.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

If w08 was made with a 10% tolerance on aero, suspension and chassis... Imagine the filthy beast that will be the w09!

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/merc ... gn-990752/
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

The 10% could be one reason for the long wheelbase, of course. Get the rest sorted, shorten it and play with the rake.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

roon
roon
412
Joined: 17 Dec 2016, 19:04

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

Given Merc's level of development and speed thereof, I would not be surprised to see Merc take the middle route--a both short and long wheelbase car. Changing gearbox casings, floor and engine-cover per track-type. SWB mode for Monaco and the like. LWB mode for Monza and such. Maybe even an intermediate mode. Only thing to stop them is traditional development limits. Will the W09 be a transformer?

User avatar
dren
226
Joined: 03 Mar 2010, 14:14

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

The supposed 10% was built in for set-up adjustability for 2017. The article stated that the actual issues they ran into weren't in the 10% adjustability window they built into the car. So there is improvement in removing that 10% and optimizing it. Overall, I figure the car will look very similar to last year's car, with maybe some suspension mounting modifications.
Honda!

f1316
f1316
82
Joined: 22 Feb 2012, 18:36

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

From the article it seems the 10% is primarily a packaging thing - I.e. not shrinkwrapping for absolute peak performance but allowing 10% tolerance for adjustment should they need it, perhaps for things like cooling, weight distribution etc.

But the issues they had seemed to be more tyre related, so this kind of loose packaging would be of little benefit for those types of things.

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
26 Dec 2017, 20:30
The 10% could be one reason for the long wheelbase, of course. Get the rest sorted, shorten it and play with the rake.
Not in that sense i would think. 10% allowance means give or take in either dierection. Long wheel base is not something that is easily reversible or give or take IMO. I have a hunch the allowances were for the aerodynamic structures that are formed. You give those and the surfaces they interact with a large margin for play. For the suspension, the same. You try to make the tyre working range broad (this back fired actually! ).
The long wheel base and low rake was the opposite idealogy, as that tends to be unforgiving if you get it wrong, so I presume the team strongly believed in the long wheel base concept and it was never in question. So possibly 2017 new things" like aero features, barge boards, brakes and the tyres were the things that they created the allowance for.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
559
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

roon wrote:
26 Dec 2017, 23:57
Given Merc's level of development and speed thereof, I would not be surprised to see Merc take the middle route--a both short and long wheelbase car. Changing gearbox casings, floor and engine-cover per track-type. SWB mode for Monaco and the like. LWB mode for Monza and such. Maybe even an intermediate mode. Only thing to stop them is traditional development limits. Will the W09 be a transformer?
Toto confirmed that long wheelbase will remain. Can't find the article though!
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

Racing Green in 2028

User avatar
ClarkBT11
15
Joined: 06 Oct 2015, 21:53
Location: Uk

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

There were tolerances in the W08, Mercedes can be more aggressive with the W09 is the gist of the story. I've read the article a couple of months ago, but can't find it. Motorsport are writing Mercedes(Alison) are thinking about the red bull "high rake" design, are they confident they can keep the floor attached... They haven't in the past?

Maritimer
Maritimer
19
Joined: 06 Sep 2017, 21:45
Location: Canada

Re: Mercedes W09 Speculation Thread

Post

They must be able to roll up some monster voceces with their bargeboards to pull that off.