Because they're not strictly for F1. Secrets being made public isn't the issue. Anyone can try to copy an idea. The question is do they fully understand the idea, do they have all the resources to implement that idea and if stolen then a patent can help you protect your idea, assuming you have the resources to enforce that patent.
Off topic but I'm sorry to hear that. I assume your friend spent $150K in legal fees not court costs. It probably never went to trial. IMO, he got milked by this attorney as a preliminary discovery by his attorney should have given him a good idea of his chances of recovery and for what amount. This usually can be done with only 2-3 hours of billable time. Three of us went through the same thing as co-owners of a patent infringement case. It cost us $25K in legal fees to reach a $4.5 million settlement against a large company.Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Feb 2018, 03:34I have a friend that had a patent once.
$150k in court fees to get a $20k settlement that the guy never paid.
Also, changing the wire colors was enough to get away with most of the violation.
I'm not a big fan of patents unless it is a quickly licens-able technology.
So.. you are out of Retirement and back on the Honda F1 engineering team?Wazari wrote: ↑01 Feb 2018, 01:57If you don't suffer from eternal optimism then you don't belong in auto-racing. Also back in 2015, I was pretty sure that McLaren Honda would have grabbed a couple of podiums in 2016.
The reason I don't think the combustion process design will be duplicated is that after numerous patent searches, I have applied for six different patents for this design.
Some comments from those that have previewed it says it covers the engine not fitting in the car, the gearbox not fitting to the engine and the engine failing to fire up when they first received it.Wazari wrote: ↑02 Feb 2018, 05:22
I understand that Amazon is airing a four-part documentary on McLaren-Honda's last season. Now it makes sense on the extra camera crews that were in the pits and winter testing. I wonder if they will cover all the pre-season difficulties they had with the PU dimensions. This could be somewhat comical. We already know the Honda bashing will be there.
The communication between two very technically capable companies couldn't have been that bad? Was this a year on year issue with the PU dimensions?Snorked wrote: ↑02 Feb 2018, 11:05Some comments from those that have previewed it says it covers the engine not fitting in the car, the gearbox not fitting to the engine and the engine failing to fire up when they first received it.Wazari wrote: ↑02 Feb 2018, 05:22
I understand that Amazon is airing a four-part documentary on McLaren-Honda's last season. Now it makes sense on the extra camera crews that were in the pits and winter testing. I wonder if they will cover all the pre-season difficulties they had with the PU dimensions. This could be somewhat comical. We already know the Honda bashing will be there.
How does the misfitting happen? In the recent interview Honda have waxed lyrical about Toro Rosso listening to them on integrating the PU, so did McLaren simply ignore them
And there's no way this will be unbiased having the same producer who did a hit piece on Prost in the Senna documentary. Also looking at the credits on IMDB, there's not one Honda employee that features
Im sure those amateurs at Ferrari and Mercedes lack the resources and brainpower to make sense of such good ideas.Wazari wrote: ↑02 Feb 2018, 03:09Because they're not strictly for F1. Secrets being made public isn't the issue. Anyone can try to copy an idea. The question is do they fully understand the idea, do they have all the resources to implement that idea and if stolen then a patent can help you protect your idea, assuming you have the resources to enforce that patent.