Squid wrote: ↑16 Feb 2018, 06:23
GhostF1 wrote: ↑15 Feb 2018, 22:28
Big Mangalhit wrote: ↑15 Feb 2018, 18:03
Since they used something like 9 ICE's and TC's I don't think MGU-H is the only thing they need to improve. Also it's hard to predict what will happen in the tests- Last year by this time everybody was saying they needed to improve energy deployment and efficiency and nobody was saying they needed to improve the oil chamber and MGU-H bearings. And yet they really needed to take care of that and almost had no teste because of such. Hopefully this year they'll start with the right foot.
This has been discussed to death. The major Achilles heel was the MGU-H, it was literally the root cause of failure 99% of the time, I believe Canada was an actual ICE issue where Hasegawa was quoted as being shocked, as it was the first time they'd seen this issue before.
It was developed by McLaren and other outside companies. The issue was exacerbated by the oil blow by from the Honda PU. Hard to fine tune this when it isn't your own component.
Several occasions the MGU-H detonated and terminally damaged the entire PU due to its location.
Honda have since stated they intend to utilise their own design they have been working on, however they also said some of the "Hybrid componentry" will still need to be sourced from McLaren at the start, but it will eventually become an entirely Honda affair. When that will be, I'd probably think mid season. Either way, bring on the car reveals, testing and the Aus GP pls. This wait is killing me now
And even when the TC and ICE survived, might as well change them for new units since they will be starting at the back anyway. Good for implementing small upgrades and to get more mileage out of the parts.
The engine component usage chart made the other components look unreliable when they were actually fine.
No completely truth that the MGU-H was the only problem. It was also the oil tank and vibration... at least.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13086 ... 7-troubles
Also Honda used 8 and 9 MGU-K; and 7 ES/CE in their cars, which are quite separated from the MGU-H. This year they can only use 2!!
You can claim that they did it because they already had penalties but truth is that EVERY OTHER CAR used only 4 of each of these components with some of them only using 2 of the ES/CE!!
So even tho all 3 other manufacturers show great reliability on all parts (especially MERC/Ferrari which out of 12 cars only Vet and Ham got a single penalty) Honda is still a big question mark. I am all for wishful thinking but if you think that their problems were strictly coming from the MGU-H I think you are completely wrong.
Luckily it is possible that they solved their combustion principles and that operations run smoother this year, also maybe they'll have and easier time integrating in a more low pressure environment of STR. I mean who the hell would care if Brandon Hartley were saying he was on a GP2 engine...