fwiw my guess would be that thousands of DKW motorcycles got there first
DKW cars also
What a fantastic story, something for everyone.Pinger wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 20:30The world's first looper?
https://oldmachinepress.com/articles/page/23/
Scroll about 1/4 way down.
High speed inlet hysterisis is a fairly mysterious area, but of huge significanceJ.A.W. wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 10:30@ Pinger, recent 2T developments in (highly constrained rules-wise) Kart racing have included (AFAIK)
exhaust port-nozzle-pipe research into both liquid cooling ( to reduce temp of the returning fuel-air charge),
& 'sonic' nozzle design shapes - to obviate 'shock-choke' - gas-flow issues at high rpm..
VE (or ME) and effective gas exchange during transition and over the rev range is one of the keys (highly sensitive to throttling), the other being combustion (where they have an inherent advantage over the 4T).Pinger wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 18:06Cooling the 'stored' charge is pretty cunning. Highlights an inherent problem with branch manifolds which is that the piston at or around TDC gets a positive pulse (which it has no use for) which can only add heat to its skirt. The pulse will be of lower pressure than with a full fat expansion chamber and will impact only the skirt - not the rings. A minor problem given the lower state of tune, but any unnecessary heat flow to a piston is unwelcome.J.A.W. wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 10:30@ Pinger, recent 2T developments in (highly constrained rules-wise) Kart racing have included (AFAIK)
exhaust port-nozzle-pipe research into both liquid cooling ( to reduce temp of the returning fuel-air charge),
& 'sonic' nozzle design shapes - to obviate 'shock-choke' - gas-flow issues at high rpm..
Re 'adjustability' of tuned pipes to rpm. Power valves do a good job there as well as their primary task of masking the port. The change in timing neatly re-synchs the pipes to the rpm. High maintenance though by what I can ascertain, requiring regular cleaning of carbon if they are not to stick.
Thanks for that. If only they would have used methanolJ.A.W. wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 23:20Check this thread-site, Johnny, look for recent posts from member 'Wobbly' & others.. or try a 'search'.
https://www.kiwibiker.co.nz/forums/show ... gine-tuner
What's the inherent combustion advantage over 4T ?johnny comelately wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 23:36VE (or ME) and effective gas exchange during transition and over the rev range is one of the keys (highly sensitive to throttling), the other being combustion (where they have an inherent advantage over the 4T).Pinger wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 18:06Cooling the 'stored' charge is pretty cunning. Highlights an inherent problem with branch manifolds which is that the piston at or around TDC gets a positive pulse (which it has no use for) which can only add heat to its skirt. The pulse will be of lower pressure than with a full fat expansion chamber and will impact only the skirt - not the rings. A minor problem given the lower state of tune, but any unnecessary heat flow to a piston is unwelcome.J.A.W. wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 10:30@ Pinger, recent 2T developments in (highly constrained rules-wise) Kart racing have included (AFAIK)
exhaust port-nozzle-pipe research into both liquid cooling ( to reduce temp of the returning fuel-air charge),
& 'sonic' nozzle design shapes - to obviate 'shock-choke' - gas-flow issues at high rpm..
Re 'adjustability' of tuned pipes to rpm. Power valves do a good job there as well as their primary task of masking the port. The change in timing neatly re-synchs the pipes to the rpm. High maintenance though by what I can ascertain, requiring regular cleaning of carbon if they are not to stick.
All these methods above have been fantastic at improving the charged two stroke
Further, it was a mach 4 and flogged the factory bikes (late 70's). Rev activated stepper motor. And the bloke that got it banned (sore loser) is mentioned elsewhere in the forum.johnny comelately wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 07:32we did have that where the distance between the two cones was varied via a rack and pinion system according to rpm, eventually bannedJ.A.W. wrote: ↑23 Mar 2018, 03:48No reason some technical sophistication cannot be added to the exhaust to gain a wider power-spread
for road machines..
A internal cone, able to be moved fore & aft - within the fat part of the pipe - in tune with rpm change,
(controlled as exhaust 'power valves' & the like have been - for the past few decades)..
http://www.rpdinc.com/10435-thickbox/plastic-funnel.jpg
I read that as 2T combustion being somehow superior to 4T on a 'per powerstroke' basis.
You what ?johnny comelately wrote: ↑24 Mar 2018, 00:41Yes precisely, and you can spend your time on boundary layer management amongst other things
"You what?"