What an awful race
No overtaking possible, undeserved winner.
Really sad if this year is like this
Well even Alonso and the slow McLaren held VES,HUL,BOT...ripper wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:53I found this picture only few minutes ago:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZEXZpuX4AAZYk9.jpg:large
Overtaking at Albert Park is difficult, overtaking a Ferrari today was even harder
the plan was to put raikkonen in and leave vettel out longer, this is a basic situation when its 2 vs 1 because mercedes have to give up the lead at least momentarilyRestomaniac wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:56Erm what? Without the VSC he would have been nowhere near either Hamilton or Raikkonen. So by that logic the plan was 'go really slow so that you are almost certainly going to finish miles off the lead and your teammate'.
Aparently quick enough to be infront.Jambier wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:59Well even Alonso and the slow McLaren held VES,HUL,BOT...ripper wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:53I found this picture only few minutes ago:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZEXZpuX4AAZYk9.jpg:large
Overtaking at Albert Park is difficult, overtaking a Ferrari today was even harder
No, of course not, but Any unfair advantage (like RBR flexi front wing Silverstone last year) usually gets killed straight away, and that is only right.rules are rules and If you outsmart them it will at Some point get taken away (or become the norm).Restomaniac wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 00:35Were you moaning when RedBull found a clever way to dominate?Sieper wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 00:280,1 liter per 100 km, that is about 0,3 liter for a race distance. Streetcar engines are no reference, agreed. That is what Renault uses up and apparently even the Mercedes customer teams, this data was posted last year. When the limit was reduced to 0.9 the actual usage was 0,89 liter in that chart. To me that shows it has no reference to real oil usage but can be strictly controlled (If there is truth to these numbers;which I do believe).
Listen I am for the one top three teams with the biggest power deficit, (RBR) so offcourse I would like the playfield leveled a bit more (how much it is I don’t know) but it is the actual rule book oil is not meant as fuel and the merc engine seems capable (If the Numbers posted are correct) of meeting the next to zero oil burn If that were now to be the enforced rule.
And If it were enforced to 0,1 and merc would still be party moding in Q3 at least that would shut my whining up for good! A good thing for all parties involved so Lets hope 0,1 will get enforced at Some point.
Vettel would have been nowhere near Hamilton or Raikkonen without his blind luck. To then make out that it was all a master plan?Rodzilla wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:59the plan was to put raikkonen in and leave vettel out longer, this is a basic situation when its 2 vs 1 because mercedes have to give up the lead at least momentarilyRestomaniac wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:56Erm what? Without the VSC he would have been nowhere near either Hamilton or Raikkonen. So by that logic the plan was 'go really slow so that you are almost certainly going to finish miles off the lead and your teammate'.
Exactly!Restomaniac wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:56Erm what? Without the VSC he would have been nowhere near either Hamilton or Raikkonen. So by that logic the plan was 'go really slow so that you are almost certainly going to finish miles off the lead and your teammate'.
Jambier wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:59Well even Alonso and the slow McLaren held VES,HUL,BOT...ripper wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:53I found this picture only few minutes ago:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DZEXZpuX4AAZYk9.jpg:large
Overtaking at Albert Park is difficult, overtaking a Ferrari today was even harder
This was IMHO the only way to force Hamilton to change his tyres.Rodzilla wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:59the plan was to put raikkonen in and leave vettel out longer, this is a basic situation when its 2 vs 1 because mercedes have to give up the lead at least momentarilyRestomaniac wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 09:56Erm what? Without the VSC he would have been nowhere near either Hamilton or Raikkonen. So by that logic the plan was 'go really slow so that you are almost certainly going to finish miles off the lead and your teammate'.
Had VSC not happened, this would have made zero difference to RAI's race. He had more than enough time not to get overcut by Vettel, so it's a non-issue.
Commentators constantly referencing how good Kimi has been on the tyres in testing, best at managing stint pace, pulling away from Seb in the first stint.
The same can be said for a dumb luck safety car.Chene_Mostert wrote: ↑25 Mar 2018, 10:12Very clear, it's amazing how flattering Strat14 can be to a driver.