Maybe he just didn't want to do the last lap. Vettel wasn't catching him prior to that. His last lap was a 1:50, which seemed to come out of the blue, he actually slowed down to get lapped. Nothing gained or lost by doing the extra lap, one more lap won't save the PU or destroy it.
+1Ground Effect wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:03Maybe he just didn't want to do the last lap. Vettel wasn't catching him prior to that. His last lap was a 1:50, which seemed to come out of the blue, he actually slowed down to get lapped. Nothing gained or lost by doing the extra lap, one more lap won't save the PU or destroy it.
True, but when you add to that a fact that they where just behind first two in race and every news station around world doing short report of race will show winner crossing checkered flag, then is beneficialloner wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:07+1Ground Effect wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:03Maybe he just didn't want to do the last lap. Vettel wasn't catching him prior to that. His last lap was a 1:50, which seemed to come out of the blue, he actually slowed down to get lapped. Nothing gained or lost by doing the extra lap, one more lap won't save the PU or destroy it.
Mclaren race commmentary confirmed it was because fuel was criticalGround Effect wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:03Maybe he just didn't want to do the last lap. Vettel wasn't catching him prior to that. His last lap was a 1:50, which seemed to come out of the blue, he actually slowed down to get lapped. Nothing gained or lost by doing the extra lap, one more lap won't save the PU or destroy it.
Don't think the standings mean much at this stage as most teams with new engines detuned them slightly - Mclaren included.Andres125sx wrote: ↑09 Apr 2018, 17:23Wow I see a lot of people who didn´t post after Merlbourne but have been quite fast to post their opinions (read, rants) after Bahrain, to the point this thread has grown around 15 pages in no time
Yeah Gasly and STR have been impressive in Bahrain, but one single result with one single car does not make a norm.
The next is not intended to get angry McLaren haters, it´s only to motivate McLaren fans who read this thread and are tempted to join the haters
2018 WCC standings:
1 FERRARI 65
2 MERCEDES 55
3 MCLAREN RENAULT 22
4 RED BULL RACING TAG HEUER 20
5 RENAULT 15
6 SCUDERIA TORO ROSSO HONDA 12
7 HAAS FERRARI 10
8 SAUBER FERRARI 2
9 FORCE INDIA MERCEDES 1
10 WILLIAMS MERCEDES 0
Yes that is correct, McLaren is 3rd team right not. We all know that´s due to RBR problems, but even so it´s encouraging. In the whole Honda era not a single time they scored points with both cars two consecutive GPs, but first two GPs with Renault, and both cars score points in both.
If that´s not a step forward please let me know what´s that
How some people seem to be oblivious to this is beyond me.PhillipM wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 17:01That would be a more convincing arguement if:
a) Alonso hadn't been stuck behind a Renault he was clearly faster than and;
b)The gap between Alonso and Hartley was actually 48 seconds, when it was actually more like 19 or 20 seconds until Alonso backed right off on the last lap to let the leaders catch him.
So it seems some kind of b-spec is in development and they clearly need it."We just miscalculated the weekend in terms of set-up," said Boullier. "It's a mistake we've done and we don't want to repeat it.
"We need to be where we believe we should be and can't have too many mistakes like this."
Alonso declared after Australia that McLaren could forget the midfield and target Red Bull, but admitted in Bahrain that would not be possible until the MCL33 received crucial developments.
"The car we have here on the track and the car we are developing at the factory is different," said Alonso.
"That car is fixing all our weakness, so we need to bring that car as soon as possible."
Boullier insisted he had "100%" confidence in McLaren's technical team, and explained that part of its Bahrain troubles was getting the most out of the tyres and the cars carrying too much downforce.
McLaren's pre-season reliability woe forced it to alter its updates schedule, and Boullier added: "That's why we have a lot to come and that's why Fernando is so positive in terms of upgrades and the next few races.
"Hopefully that will be enough to clear it [the midfield]."
unless you're running low on fuel???loner wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:07+1Ground Effect wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 15:03Maybe he just didn't want to do the last lap. Vettel wasn't catching him prior to that. His last lap was a 1:50, which seemed to come out of the blue, he actually slowed down to get lapped. Nothing gained or lost by doing the extra lap, one more lap won't save the PU or destroy it.
The R & D is just running way ahead of production....I think they kept funding R&D over the winter(normal) and ramped up production slowly till they received the money from F1 in March(little later than normal).RonDennis wrote: ↑10 Apr 2018, 17:22
So it seems some kind of b-spec is in development and they clearly need it.
https://www.autosport.com/f1/news/13531 ... t-expected
I read that too, new nose for Barcelona.