yes. Apparently Ferrari should introduce new floor which could possibly solve their rear end problem. According to motorsport.it
I agree that the long straights are important. Though Any acceleration zone matters too, as drag has much less of an effect at lower speed. Hp difference shows up most while accelerating at medium speed, while top speed is more about aero. That's why hp matters even at Monaco. Will be exciting to see where Red Bull is at. Bahrain was awesome but would have been even better if not for Red Bull dnfsVettel165 wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 10:59For this GP you still need a very good engine, otherwise you will get destroyed on the two main straights. I am guessing RBR with Renault engine will lose at least 0,3-0,4s per lap on this two straights comparing to Mercedes, Ferrari cars. Its gonna be interesting to watch if Ferrari will be still the fastest at the end of that (1200 m) straight in China.
Just thinking .. if turning your engine up that much it only survives 4 rounds (instead of 7), couldn’t that give you the extra power to have a greater chance to win a race?
I actually was thinking of the same. IMo, Mercedes is adamant to do the whole season on 3 engines, while Ferrari may have already accepted that they will get a penalty somewhere down the line. This would explain why Merc turned the engines way down in free practice last weekend, and why Ferrari seemed much faster as well. But If Ferrari is already conceding one race they will start from the back, and Merc never has to take a penalty, I wonder who will benefit more? And Redbull may plan for 5 engines and be compromised in 2 races but they will be able to run fresher engines, take in upgrades and run higher engine modes more frequently. We shall see.langedweil wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 01:10Just thinking .. if turning your engine up that much it only survives 4 rounds (instead of 7), couldn’t that give you the extra power to have a greater chance to win a race?
For instance, if RB with their topspeed deficit opted for let’s say 5 PU’s, they’d screw up 2 races (while possibly still be able to score points) but have a way better chance of winning a race.
Or is that just utter bull ?
(I know one pu should last 5 rnds)
I mean really?? This my friends is how misinformation and rumors begin on the internet. LolHammerfist wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 04:54I actually was thinking of the same. IMo, Mercedes is adamant to do the whole season on 3 engines, while Ferrari may have already accepted that they will get a penalty somewhere down the line. This would explain why Merc turned the engines way down in free practice last weekend, and why Ferrari seemed much faster as well. But If Ferrari is already conceding one race they will start from the back, and Merc never has to take a penalty, I wonder who will benefit more? And Redbull may plan for 5 engines and be compromised in 2 races but they will be able to run fresher engines, take in upgrades and run higher engine modes more frequently. We shall see.langedweil wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 01:10Just thinking .. if turning your engine up that much it only survives 4 rounds (instead of 7), couldn’t that give you the extra power to have a greater chance to win a race?
For instance, if RB with their topspeed deficit opted for let’s say 5 PU’s, they’d screw up 2 races (while possibly still be able to score points) but have a way better chance of winning a race.
Or is that just utter bull ?
(I know one pu should last 5 rnds)
This track has tradionally suited Mercedes and I see now reason why they shouldn´t be very strong here. I have some doubts about how strong Ferrari can be here. The longer wheelbase and the new floor could be a boost but its difficult to measure it.FrukostScones wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 08:26I see no indication that speaks against a Ferrari double victory this week-end.
Did’t I read somewhere that Toto says it is rear limited nowadays?Vettel165 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 09:13Which factor should play into Ferraris hands and which to Mercedes this weekend.
Cool weather: Mercedes
Q3 tyres (US): Ferrari
Tyre pressures: dont know them
High tyre wear: Ferrari
Front-limited circuit: Mercedes
Power of the engine (main straight): both are likely equal
A new weather forecast from yr.no (usually a very reliable website) which gets its data from ECMWF weather (used by european meteorologist) model is showing now no rain for FP1, and maybe just a shower for FP2, but nothing big. Hope it stay like this.
https://postimages.org/
I thought that too! He said it in a Sky interview at Bahrain, but I can’t remember if he was referring to China or Bahrain... but I don’t think Bahrain has ever been front limited, so most likely China.George-Jung wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 09:43Did’t I read somewhere that Toto says it is rear limited nowadays?Vettel165 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 09:13Which factor should play into Ferraris hands and which to Mercedes this weekend.
Cool weather: Mercedes
Q3 tyres (US): Ferrari
Tyre pressures: dont know them
High tyre wear: Ferrari
Front-limited circuit: Mercedes
Power of the engine (main straight): both are likely equal
A new weather forecast from yr.no (usually a very reliable website) which gets its data from ECMWF weather (used by european meteorologist) model is showing now no rain for FP1, and maybe just a shower for FP2, but nothing big. Hope it stay like this.
https://postimages.org/
I think we should put it equal there as well. It's close enough that it doesn't make enough of a difference, like PUs last year already (this year seems even more).Vettel165 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 09:13Which factor should play into Ferraris hands and which to Mercedes this weekend.
Cool weather: Mercedes
Q3 tyres (US): Ferrari
Tyre pressures: dont know them
High tyre wear: Ferrari
Front-limited circuit: Mercedes
Power of the engine (main straight): both are likely equal