So I'm just answering your question... Just a little better would bring them closer to the front two and a works contract.ivanlesk wrote:What would be RB-s gain (switching to Honda) if Honda and Renault would be similar in performance? (or if one would be just a LITTLE bit better?
The maximum reaponsable of Honda Motorsport Masashi Yamamoto is in Baku. Here there would be a key meeting with Red Bull to define the possible Honda engine for the Milton Keynes squadron for 2019/2020. This morning Marko has met with Tost.
HPD wrote: ↑28 Apr 2018, 14:32https://twitter.com/AlbertFabrega/statu ... 9195127808
The maximum reaponsable of Honda Motorsport Masashi Yamamoto is in Baku. Here there would be a key meeting with Red Bull to define the possible Honda engine for the Milton Keynes squadron for 2019/2020. This morning Marko has met with Tost.
It also gives them 2 years with Honda before 2021. I'm just playing devils advocate.ivanlesk wrote:But that would set them back in integration terms for next year, wouldn't it?
And they would probably lose more in driveability rather than gain in little batter pu ( in case of switching to Honda)
Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say that staying with R is better than going with H.JonoNic wrote: ↑28 Apr 2018, 14:43It also gives them 2 years with Honda before 2021. I'm just playing devils advocate.ivanlesk wrote:But that would set them back in integration terms for next year, wouldn't it?
And they would probably lose more in driveability rather than gain in little batter pu ( in case of switching to Honda)
many gains for both teams .. RBR will be granted with a works deal with a manufacturer don't have his own racing teamivanlesk wrote: ↑28 Apr 2018, 14:50Don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say that staying with R is better than going with H.JonoNic wrote: ↑28 Apr 2018, 14:43It also gives them 2 years with Honda before 2021. I'm just playing devils advocate.ivanlesk wrote:But that would set them back in integration terms for next year, wouldn't it?
And they would probably lose more in driveability rather than gain in little batter pu ( in case of switching to Honda)
Just, trying to understand why do extra effort to be in same place (if engines will converge or at least Honda and Renault will be in same form in 2019 and everybody altogether will be a lot closer in 2020). Why not use this resources and develop better package without dealing with integration issues and getting to now new PU.
Would there be any other gain?
Both McLaren and RBR have already found out that a Merc customer deal is off the table the hard way. I really don't think rebadging the name was the obstructing issue there and I don't see why it should be seriously considered as an option.muramasa wrote: ↑28 Apr 2018, 10:09Anyway I'd be really surprised if RBR switch to Honda for 2019. Honda PU is the worst and you cannot simply know their short-mid term prospect now or in the next several months, Honda should get more competitive but Renault will advance as well and always before Honda does (PU pecking order will not change in current PU era, gap b/w makers may or may not shrink), and RBR will have to throw away years of experience regarding Renault PU integration and reset everything for accommodating Honda which is just massive. Huge gamble, or much more than that. Only swap that makes sense is Merc or Ferrari.
Perhaps Aston Martin badged Merc PU is much more likely than Honda. I'd guess RBR will see out current engine reg era with Renault, and see how 2021 reg goes and wait for what VW will do.
the only real way of evaluating honda is to put the honda in a redbulll test mule or bench test it with the renault for comparision. cant compare with TR ,new drivers and still lacking in mechanical grip and aero compared to big sister.RBR is clearly serious about evaluating Honda, why else would they have bent over backwards to facilitate the exchange with McLaren and STR apart from to destabilise Woking?