Hmm, I was watching the FP and didn't spot that -- good catch. I'm so glad they've removed it...the bridge-wing is awful looking.kekekeke wrote:Lewis was running without the bridge wing for the second half of FP2. Having seen McLaren for a year and a half with it, the car looked weird for a lack of better word.
I wonder what they'll do tomorrow. Perhaps with the enforced central strut, the bridge wing isn't as effective any more.
The track temperature was much lower in the morning session, giving faster times...I think Alonso may surprise a few people in Quali.nae wrote:b%cks to the racing lets just slag each other off
FA's fastest is lap still 0.5 away from Massa in the morning
good time for 5th on the grid
Scotracer wrote:The track temperature was much lower in the morning session, giving faster times...I think Alonso may surprise a few people in Quali.nae wrote:b%cks to the racing lets just slag each other off
FA's fastest is lap still 0.5 away from Massa in the morning
good time for 5th on the grid
I think it's pretty tough, although my memory may fail me. In any case, worn tires is the last thing you want in S2. I may not like Magny Cours at all, but the quick chicanes and the multi-radius Turn 9 are one of the best places to watch how good F1 cars are.axle wrote:Is France hard on tyres? Is a 1 stopper an ok strategy? Bearing in mind how Lewis chews his tyres...
axle wrote:I can see Renault going for pole at any cost to the race strategy. As overtaking is limited for at least the first segment of the race Alonso can keep them all behind him and give himself every chance of a podium...even if the Ferrari's look like they'll waltz off once released.
Is France hard on tyres? Is a 1 stopper an ok strategy? Bearing in mind how Lewis chews his tyres...
According to diario As he had about 30 kg. of fuelben_watkins wrote:I think it's a banzai lap on fumes for Alonso.. Renault in front of home crowd... Especially after blowing an engine in FP1
Martin Whitmarsh has said that the tyre wear is quite high and he spoke of the front end being critical for a potential 1 stopper.France Friday quotes: Bridgestone
Friday, June 20th 2008, 16:03 GMT
Hirohide Hamashima - Director of Bridgestone Motorsport Tyre Development: "This morning the circuit was quite dirty as usual and we saw front tyre graining on some cars.
"In the afternoon session, the track was a lot cleaner and the graining vanished. The second session allowed teams to compare the medium and soft compounds and it seems that the soft compound has an initial advantage of 0.2 - 0.4 seconds.
"However, at the moment the rear tyre degradation of the soft compound is bigger than that of the medium compound. Tomorrow's running will be interesting as teams will gain more data and try to decide their strategy for the race."
It's nevertheless a pretty good time, good enough for Q3. I wouldn't try to read too much into AS (suppose apostrophe s follows), which is ironically known between my friends as "objective and truthfull information". By the way, that link also says that Alonso is 10km/h faster than Piquet in Turns 10/11 (before Chateau d'Eau). Telling. Where's the apex speed measurement in Magny Cours?WhiteBlue wrote:so he had out lap, qualifying lap, in lap. he will have eploratory lap and formation lap. By the time the race starts this is down to 20 kg. so he may be in by 10 laps.
Not really. With the current qualifying format drivers have always been allowed to choose which tires they start the race with. In any case, the two compound rule is really idiotic, since it basically kills one-stop strategies. Have we seen any race where this rule has improved the race?WhiteBlue wrote: So one could put this together to mean that for pole you probably have to run the soft tyres which will not be good enough to go 30 laps.
You make a very fair point here, WhiteBlue. Still, I do wonder how many of the folks that see a Bridgestone = F1 advertisement really know every driver has to use both tire compounds in a race. Note that I feel that, currently, Bridgestone has all the right in the world to talk about their F1 involvement and build up their image of performance tire suppliers.WhiteBlue wrote:Miguel, you are right, I forgot about the tyre change.
The two tyre rule is simply to help bridgestone to generate tyre talk in return for the supply and service they do. In my view that is legitimate because no companyt will just do it out of their good heart. they have to show a profit and that isn't possible if they do not generate PR from F1.