Doesnt even have lights, so would be really difficult at night :-psantos wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 13:59I don't see why we don't need. This was just to show what Porsche Could have made with no rules, and for a single lap. Could this car win the 24H of Le Mans? I doubt it. It doesn't even have whippers. Or ar con.Bence wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 08:27Nope, it's a message to the world, that we don't need the FIA...Nonserviam85 wrote: ↑11 Apr 2018, 17:22Probably a statement to FIA as to what relaxed rules can produce...
To be fair the lights from cars of the 1970s or 1980s doing 380+ km/h at LeMans don't really count, so it would be more or less the same!Holm86 wrote: ↑12 Apr 2018, 14:39Doesnt even have lights, so would be really difficult at night :-p
That car was as close to a closed wheel F1 car as you could get.
It never has been. Open wheel cars are aerodynamically garbage and wouldn't exist as a form of motorsport if they weren't forced to exist. They've been trash since the 1955 W196 Merc got it's bodywork banned.
It was not banned outright, it was prohibited from having a faired version after dominating with the package at faster circuits like AVUS. This was the point that it became rule of law in the premier from of racing and has perpetuated since. Had it not happened as the tires got wider and materials for bodywork got lighter (which is why they didn't run that way at slower circuits), F1 would have closed-in wheels today.Tommy Cookers wrote: ↑12 Jun 2018, 18:40news to me - when was it banned ?
it was rubbish because it produced lift at the front axle - as did many eg in endurance races though not D-type Jaguars