2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
JonoNic
4
Joined: 05 Mar 2015, 15:54

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

dans79 wrote:
f1316 wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 18:47
Vettel seemed to be quite happy and to think they would be strong in the race, so let’s see.

Definitely advantage Mercedes.
He should be worried, he has Max next to him and Ric behind. If the get away is clean, he might get jumped during the stops.
It's quite a drag to the first corner. Are you sure?
Always find the gap then use it.

zeph
zeph
1
Joined: 07 Aug 2010, 11:54
Location: Los Angeles

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

How the mighty have fallen; McLaren and Williams dead last on the grid.


And Grosjean? SMH. I’d be surprised if he returns next season. That seat seems like a logicalnext step for Leclerc.

Wynters
Wynters
6
Joined: 15 May 2016, 14:49

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

LM10 wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 17:17
Dominant Mercedes. They were not beatable today. But I hope Mercedes fans won't tell that it's up to the new engine which is vastly faster than Ferrari's. It was a combination of all factors.
It's odd, isn't it? Where has Ferrari's engine advantage gone? :wink:

On a serious note, where were the other Mercedes powered cars compared to their Ferrari and Renault rivals? The midfield battle is great this year! It's genuinely difficult to pick out who will finish where.

Fingers-crossed for a dry start then some rain during the race. Changable conditions are far more interesting than everyone rolling around in a slow train.

User avatar
MtthsMlw
1036
Joined: 12 Jul 2017, 18:38
Location: Germany

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post


User avatar
JonoNic
4
Joined: 05 Mar 2015, 15:54

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Raikkonen, Grosjean and Boullier are having some mediocre or even very bad seasons for a while now. What happened to these big role players from the magic Lotus years?
Always find the gap then use it.

Restomaniac
Restomaniac
0
Joined: 16 May 2016, 01:09
Location: Hull

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

zeph wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 19:05
How the mighty have fallen; McLaren and Williams dead last on the grid.


And Grosjean? SMH. I’d be surprised if he returns next season. That seat seems like a logicalnext step for Leclerc.
I was waiting for Grosjean to randomly blame someone, anyone else for his crash today. He could have just stated that he had done it on purpose again though.

Brenton
Brenton
1
Joined: 17 Dec 2017, 07:28

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Super close between Ferrari and Mercedes it looks like!
GrandAxe wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 17:45
I don't blame Kimi for his so-so performances. He is doing just fine.
Any driver that has to compromise so many of their races "for the team" (as he does) would have both motivation and confidence deficits.
What I don't understand about the Kimi apologists who say that he's doing a good job, is what would they consider to be an unsatisfactory performance? Finishing behind a Renault? Miss Q3 on a regular basis?
MtthsMlw wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 17:27
The gap between the top teams and the rest is quite large here.
Exaggerated though by the fact that 9th place's time in Q3 would have been too slow to get out of Q1.

Fulcrum
Fulcrum
15
Joined: 25 Aug 2014, 18:05

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Kimi clearly fudged up his Q3 lap. His Q1 and Q2 times were on par with his teammate, so 6th is clearly not representative of his speed.

However, I can't excuse the fact he made the mistake - that's all on him, and he will be living with the mistake for the entire race should he not get a good start.

It's worthwhile noting that while we are singing Leclerc's praises he also produced a bit of a turd of a lap in Q3 - slower than his Q1 time, and it would have qualified him 14th (1 place in front of Ericsson) had he produced it in Q2. He got 8th by default, as the Haas drivers threw their laps - and cars in the case of Grosjean - away.

User avatar
F1NAC
169
Joined: 31 Mar 2013, 22:35

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Fulcrum wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:06
Kimi clearly fudged up his Q3 lap. His Q1 and Q2 times were on par with his teammate, so 6th is clearly not representative of his speed.

However, I can't excuse the fact he made the mistake - that's all on him, and he will be living with the mistake for the entire race should he not get a good start.

It's worthwhile noting that while we are singing Leclerc's praises he also produced a bit of a turd of a lap in Q3 - slower than his Q1 time, and it would have qualified him 14th (1 place in front of Ericsson) had he produced it in Q2. He got 8th by default, as the Haas drivers threw their laps - and cars in the case of Grosjean - away.
I think Leclerc ran on used tyres

Fulcrum
Fulcrum
15
Joined: 25 Aug 2014, 18:05

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

F1NAC wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:09
Fulcrum wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:06
Kimi clearly fudged up his Q3 lap. His Q1 and Q2 times were on par with his teammate, so 6th is clearly not representative of his speed.

However, I can't excuse the fact he made the mistake - that's all on him, and he will be living with the mistake for the entire race should he not get a good start.

It's worthwhile noting that while we are singing Leclerc's praises he also produced a bit of a turd of a lap in Q3 - slower than his Q1 time, and it would have qualified him 14th (1 place in front of Ericsson) had he produced it in Q2. He got 8th by default, as the Haas drivers threw their laps - and cars in the case of Grosjean - away.
I think Leclerc ran on used tyres
Fair enough, although why? He would get an extra set just for making Q3 right?

User avatar
Vanja #66
1562
Joined: 19 Mar 2012, 16:38

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Fulcrum wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:11
Fair enough, although why? He would get an extra set just for making Q3 right?
It's very possible the team forgot about that, it's been a while after all.
And they call it a stall. A STALL!

#DwarvesAreNaturalSprinters
#BlessYouLaddie

GrandAxe
GrandAxe
12
Joined: 01 Aug 2013, 17:06

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Brenton wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 19:36
What I don't understand about the Kimi apologists who say that he's doing a good job, is what would they consider to be an unsatisfactory performance? Finishing behind a Renault? Miss Q3 on a regular basis?
"Apologists"? You should be ashamed of your manners.

Anyone who has to throw away races, including wins like Kimi is bound to be demotivated and to lose a degree of self esteem. He is a human being with feelings and aspirations after all, not a robot. Every driver who has been in that position (the likes of Coulthard, Barichello, Massa etc) speaks bitterly about the experience. You and I would to.

We are also forgetting that Kimi is a World champion who by dint of his talent, has spent the majority of his F1 career at top teams. Only the best can reach such heights, therefore it is only fair to see Kimi's current performances within the circumstances of his current role. A fairer argument would be to question why a senior driver and WDC would take the role of a number two, which should be a younger drivers preserve.

Lastly, I'm a Lewis, McLaren and Mercedes fan, but that doesn't stop me from being objective.

Fulcrum
Fulcrum
15
Joined: 25 Aug 2014, 18:05

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

GrandAxe wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:17
Brenton wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 19:36
What I don't understand about the Kimi apologists who say that he's doing a good job, is what would they consider to be an unsatisfactory performance? Finishing behind a Renault? Miss Q3 on a regular basis?
"Apologists"? You should be ashamed of your manners.

Anyone who has to throw away races, including wins like Kimi is bound to be demotivated and to lose a degree of self esteem. He is a human being with feelings and aspirations after all, not a robot. Every driver who has been in that position (the likes of Coulthard, Barichello, Massa etc) speaks bitterly about the experience. You and I would to.

We are also forgetting that Kimi is a World champion who by dint of his talent, has spent the majority of his F1 career at top teams. Only the best can reach such heights, therefore it is only fair to see Kimi's current performances within the circumstances of his current role. A fairer argument would be to question why a senior driver and WDC would take the role of a number two, which should be a younger drivers preserve.

Lastly, I'm a Lewis, McLaren and Mercedes fan, but that doesn't stop me from being objective.
$$$ - very noble of him.

Fulcrum
Fulcrum
15
Joined: 25 Aug 2014, 18:05

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Vanja #66 wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:14
Fulcrum wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 20:11
Fair enough, although why? He would get an extra set just for making Q3 right?
It's very possible the team forgot about that, it's been a while after all.
Possible. Wouldn't have made a difference anyway, considering Sainz was on a 1:32.1

LM10
LM10
121
Joined: 07 Mar 2018, 00:07

Re: 2018 French Grand Prix, Le Castellet, June 22-24

Post

Wynters wrote:
23 Jun 2018, 19:13
It's odd, isn't it? Where has Ferrari's engine advantage gone? :wink:
Ferrari has never had a real engine advantage. If any, they were on par with Mercedes.
The thing which made Mercedes look slower than they were in Qualifying was mainly the tyre issue they had.

Redbull has been just within 2.5 tenths off Mercedes' pace in every Qualifying. The only 2 Qualifying sessions in which Mercedes was clearly faster than Redbull were Barcelona and Paul Ricard (I intentionally didn't count Melbourne because that was 80% up to hammer time). On both weekends the special tyres were used and on both weekends Mercedes was 6-7 tenths faster than Redbull. Even on a power sensitive track like China the one lap pace advantage of Mercedes over Redbull was just 1.5 tenths.

So the more interesting question should be: Why was Mercedes almost half a second faster than usual only in Barcelona and France? :)