djos wrote: ↑25 Jun 2018, 04:00
Scorpaguy wrote: ↑24 Jun 2018, 23:26
I believe we noodle-armed, tea-sipping, tofu-eating EV mama's boys have thrown down the gauntlet. Petrolheads...your move.
I honestly doubt an ICE powered vehicle will ever hold the outright record again. This is one of those scenarios where BEV's hold a huge advantage due to not being constrained by oxygen levels to produce maximum power.
I dunno... a bit academic, a few observations here:
1. EV or not, this is probably the most aerodynamically aggressive car to run at Pikes Peak, and not just speaking from the downforce side of things, but the L:D ratio almost certainly has a leg up on anything that's raced here before. We know what was optimal from the early '90s WSC cars and modern LMP developments. Loeb's Peugeot, for instance, wasn't getting the importance of that by putting a shitbox rally car body on a LMP underbody. Get a 905B out of mothball, at the least, guys.
Anyway, a rally car is not what it takes it win this race, a prototype is. It's a bit of apples/oranges.
2. I think VW focused even harder on the aero side than on the EV side of things. It's the big talking point, but they went rather conservative on the outright power (which raised eyebrows),
almost certainly to keep the downforce:weight ratio high. They obviously found a balance of aero efficiency and battery weight that made the best compromise.
3. EV right now has been culturally been given carte blanche in terms of development while ICE development has been hampered due to road regulations that have almost completely influenced motorsport regulations. While Pikes Peak is the biggest opportunity to go apeshit with ANY type of engine development, there isn't development history or president set for, say, 2-cycle engines.
They've been choked out the vast majority of forms of racing for some time now, Moto 500 being the last time they've been seen at top levels of tarmac motorsport. Turbines as well have been nipped in the bud. In other sectors where emissions and/or noise restrictions haven't led the hand of motorsport rule makers things like uniflow 2-cycle piston engines (ships) and turbines (airplanes and jets) have continued to develop and employ them.
4. More "motorsporty" ICE mills aside, do we honestly think that a lighter ICE version of this exact same car with the same power (turbo compensated for altitude) wouldn't be faster? Keep in mind weight is dropping off the car as the fuel burns off. I'm a green energy fanboy off the track, and it's cool to see this stuff continue to get developed, but unhatched chickens are being counted, me thinks. Maybe we'll get a Spa lap vs. the 919 Evo and see for sure.
Food for thought.