IT would just separate the teams that have a car that can physically do it and those that don't. If the car is physically able to drive that corner with DRS open then all of the drivers would do it to gain an advantage.
IT would just separate the teams that have a car that can physically do it and those that don't. If the car is physically able to drive that corner with DRS open then all of the drivers would do it to gain an advantage.
Kimi didn't open it, Lewis too.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 08:43IT would just separate the teams that have a car that can physically do it and those that don't. If the car is physically able to drive that corner with DRS open then all of the drivers would do it to gain an advantage.
I have no reason to doubt about Lewis motivation. I know he is fully commited to win but he has to think a Little bit before he does something. I have never shared the idea that he has lots motivation, Lewis has been (almost) always a Little bit irregular, with awesome days and some average ones.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 08:41Agreed. Got to take the rough with the smooth. It does, however, put to rest the idea that some have that he isn't motivated / doesn't care enough anymore. Seeing him shaking after taking pole, so annoyed at the end of the race - I doubt there's a driver on the grid who cares more!
The post race comments about Ferrari's alleged tactics don't sit well but from Hamilton I think it's just him putting a driver's spin on things - the emotion comes out and crystallises around a single emotional moment. From the team, I think they're trying to be clever - putting it out there that Ferrari might be using such tactics puts the red cars under scrutiny. They can't afford to do it again for fear of people thinking they really are doing it on purpose. That makes them slightly more cautious and thus easier to deal with on track.
alexx_88 wrote: ↑08 Jul 2018, 18:07I think Mercedes are doing Hamilton a huge disservice by blowing air into this balloon about Kimi crashing on purpose into him. Start of the race, cold tires, tried a move, missed the apex by probably 1m after locking up. These things happen all the time and, when it's not their favorite driver, people don't care at all.
I want Hamilton to win the championship, but I want F1 to be about racing, not about everyone being afraid to make a move because they might get hit with huge penalties for any mistake. Conditions off-line are always unpredictable and locking up happens a lot.
Even so, Hamilton was 3rd before being hit. Realistically, what was his chance of overtaking Vettel on the track?
Agreed.Just_a_fan wrote: From the team, I think they're trying to be clever - putting it out there that Ferrari might be using such tactics puts the red cars under scrutiny. They can't afford to do it again for fear of people thinking they really are doing it on purpose. That makes them slightly more cautious and thus easier to deal with on track.
Why would there be any benefit to that? The next track hasn't been resurfaced so won't be as abrasive and overheat the tyres.JonoNic wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 09:40Are teams (Like Mercedes) allowed to remove a layer themselves off the normal tyres of the next race or is it legal to do that?
I remember old group N cars in the 90s using a carving tool while their tyres spun on a wheel balancing machine to remove some tread. Probably way too primitive for F1 I guess with wheel balancing being an issue.
Well what happened to Mercedes and Red Bulls tyres in France? Was that track resurfaced with the same material too?Diesel wrote:Why would there be any benefit to that? The next track hasn't been resurfaced so won't be as abrasive and overheat the tyres.JonoNic wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 09:40Are teams (Like Mercedes) allowed to remove a layer themselves off the normal tyres of the next race or is it legal to do that?
I remember old group N cars in the 90s using a carving tool while their tyres spun on a wheel balancing machine to remove some tread. Probably way too primitive for F1 I guess with wheel balancing being an issue.
I think they could have gone for another M had they boxed under the SC.Vasconia wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 08:15It looked like a bad strategy but in the end Hulk was 6th so I guess it was a good one.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑08 Jul 2018, 22:34I couldn't understand why Renault opted to put Hulk on Hard's.![]()
Difficult to judge it. It was clear that Mercedes was managing the tyres much better but Vettel was also on delta mode because as he already said he pushed too hard the soft tyres in the first stint. So he didn´t want to make the same mistake.SiLo wrote: ↑09 Jul 2018, 10:24Shame about Kimi hitting Hamilton. But gave us a really exciting race. I feel Hamilton was easily the fastest guy on the track and likely would have worked his way back into 1st at some point without that contact.
Also do not agree with Vettel saying he would have been fine in the second stint without the safety car. Bottas was slowly reeling him in and we know his tyres would have lasted better as well.