McL-H wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:54Haha yeah perfect team radio they had 40 years agofoxmulder_ms wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:51haha, do it. I mean stop watching. Because team orders is older than F1 in F1
Yeah, radio is a must for team orders
McL-H wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:54Haha yeah perfect team radio they had 40 years agofoxmulder_ms wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:51haha, do it. I mean stop watching. Because team orders is older than F1 in F1
Keep going on. Nice to hear.GrayGreat wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:55Because Raikkonen was supposed to be on a 2 stop strategy. That's why he spent as many laps in front of Vettel as he did. It was only after he started hurting Vettel's tires (by being in Raikkonen's dirty air) that hey decided to let Vettel go. Chance of rain made Ferrari keep Raikkonen out. I don't know which race you were watching if you did not know all this. If it was clear team orders, Raikkonen would not have spent a single lap in front of Vettel. And yes, let's just conveniently forget Austria.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:42Farrari’s team orders earlier made Raikkonen give Vettel the place.
Moto GP has had more team orders last years then the F1 race had spins today
Seriously?Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:48It’s selective you chose NOT to mention it when Ferrari pull a worst trick.
Were Mercedes wrong? Yes
Were Ferrari even more wrong? Yes
1956 - Fangio was given is team mate's car...McL-H wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:54Haha yeah perfect team radio they had 40 years agofoxmulder_ms wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:51haha, do it. I mean stop watching. Because team orders is older than F1 in F1
Being the slowest one of the first four? I doubt it.zeph wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:53It was only after Bottas did try to pass Hamilton and failed that Mercedes told him to hold station. After the SC came in he had a pretty big go at it, but he couldn't pull it off. Nothing wrong there, methinks. Mercedes just didn't want to throw away the double.
Can we speculate about how Raikkonen could have won this race if he hadn't had to let Vettel pass?
Team orders, are team orders, are team orders. If Vettel was so much faster he should have just passed Raikkonen surely?GrayGreat wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:55Because Raikkonen was supposed to be on a 2 stop strategy. That's why he spent as many laps in front of Vettel as he did. It was only after he started hurting Vettel's tires (by being in Raikkonen's dirty air) that hey decided to let Vettel go. Chance of rain made Ferrari keep Raikkonen out. I don't know which race you were watching if you did not know all this. If it was clear team orders, Raikkonen would not have spent a single lap in front of Vettel. And yes, let's just conveniently forget Austria.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:42Farrari’s team orders earlier made Raikkonen give Vettel the place.
Heh. Typical reply from someone that hasn't got anything to say. Your favourite just won the race so why don't you celebrate and stop worrying about what other posters are saying here. Just saying...GPR-A wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:57Keep going on. Nice to hear.GrayGreat wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:55Because Raikkonen was supposed to be on a 2 stop strategy. That's why he spent as many laps in front of Vettel as he did. It was only after he started hurting Vettel's tires (by being in Raikkonen's dirty air) that hey decided to let Vettel go. Chance of rain made Ferrari keep Raikkonen out. I don't know which race you were watching if you did not know all this. If it was clear team orders, Raikkonen would not have spent a single lap in front of Vettel. And yes, let's just conveniently forget Austria.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 16:42Farrari’s team orders earlier made Raikkonen give Vettel the place.
4d) Except in cases of force majeure (accepted as such by the Stewards), the crossing, in any direction, of the line separating the pit entry and the track by a car entering the pit lane is prohibited.