I'm having a really tough time understanding how this trophy design got the "yes"
It was a gamble. If the rain had got worse, he'd have been 10-20+ seconds a lap quicker than anyone else around him and less prone to sticking it in the barriers too. If it had paid off, we'd be saying "great work by TR". It didn't pay off this time.
Completely agree. Everything went wrong from the point after Seb's pit stop, when they should simply say "He is on a different strategy, let him pass" to Kimi.Fulcrum wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:36
As I've commented already, I think Ferrari should shoulder some of the blame for this situation. My reasons being:
- They should have let Vettel past Raikkonen 3 or 4 laps earlier.
- Vettel would have been a further 2-3 seconds up the road of Bottas.
- They committed Raikkonen to a 2 stop, but didn't follow through with it in an optimal manner.
- They should have brought Raikkonen in 1 lap after Hamilton, putting him onto Ultras.
- Raikkonen would have covered off Hamilton, and begun to put pressure on Bottas from behind.
- Ferrari would have had the luxury of the lead, and their 2nd driver on the fastest tyres.
- Ferrari as a team would have been optimally placed to win across a wider range of circumstances, and Vettel himself would have been under less intense pressure at the end, as Kimi could have acted as a barrier to Hamilton, much like Bottas was to Raikkonen.
By focusing with myopic intensity on their lead driver's strategy, to the absolute detriment of #2 and the team overall, they inadvertently put Vettel under more pressure.
- And in the event of absolutely 'desperate circumstances, Raikkonen could have secured the win to prevent Hamilton doing so.
I guess the key difference there was the potential for a massive accident in Baku. I don't disagree that the penalties are a complete mess, you could easily go back and find various examples of no penalty where there should have been done, or a harsh penalty when perhaps there shouldn't have been one. It's always been this way, and always will be.Nathanael F1 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:43You didn't read my later comment?Diesel wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:33Isn't this what happens at nearly half the tracks on the calendar when drivers enter the pit entry and exit it because it's on the racing line?Nathanael F1 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 07:04I still don't understand how Hamilton didn't get a penalty for making up his own track when he ignored his engineer about to pit. Seriously.
No other team lodged a protest, the FIA investigated this themselves, and nobody has protested the result. That probably tells you that the rest of the F1 community doesn't agree with the vast majority of people on this forum.
It looks a bit unusual, but also a refreshing change from many boring trophies of the sponsor's logo. Most trophies are pretty forgettable.Sierra117 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 10:16I'm having a really tough time understanding how this trophy design got the "yes"
https://i.imgur.com/VD0PU4s.png
It was to risky because no one was expecting so much rain in all the track. And you really need a lot of rain to make those tyres work. Even the intermediate ones were a risky move because it was expected rain only on certain parts of the track.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 10:19It was a gamble. If the rain had got worse, he'd have been 10-20+ seconds a lap quicker than anyone else around him and less prone to sticking it in the barriers too. If it had paid off, we'd be saying "great work by TR". It didn't pay off this time.
I prefer the gorilla. At least it had some aesthetic to it, or some sort of symbolism. This one looks like some word art from the 90szac510 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 10:52It looks a bit unusual, but also a refreshing change from many boring trophies of the sponsor's logo. Most trophies are pretty forgettable.Sierra117 wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 10:16I'm having a really tough time understanding how this trophy design got the "yes"
https://i.imgur.com/VD0PU4s.png
How's that development going for you now?Ringleheim wrote: ↑22 Jul 2018, 05:27Yes, the Ferrari engine is the new Mercedes. The huge domination Merc has enjoyed since the advent of this formula is now finished.
Not sure if the Ferrari has come on strong of late or Mercedes slipped back a bit, but I am now convinced the Ferrari is straight up the faster car right now and its engine straight up the most powerful.
As things stand at the moment, it's Vettel's championship to lose.
Seeing as I love Ferrari and hate Lewis Hamilton specifically, this is a wonderful development!
How a stewarts decision from more than two decades ago should affect a decision today?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:32It got Schumacher excluded from the championship back in '97...
How a stewarts decision from more than two decades ago should affect a decision today?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:32It got Schumacher excluded from the championship back in '97...
I was just pointing out that Vettel might have been treated more harshly back in the day.Andres125sx wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 12:10How a stewarts decision from more than two decades ago should affect a decision today?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:32It got Schumacher excluded from the championship back in '97...
It's like that argument from some people claiming there was previous unfair decisions in the past so a fair decision today is actually unfair
Aren't the events we are discussing now either "back in the day?". It has been more than a year ago, and it's not relevant to any events of the German Grand Prix.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 13:07I was just pointing out that Vettel might have been treated more harshly back in the day.Andres125sx wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 12:10How a stewarts decision from more than two decades ago should affect a decision today?Just_a_fan wrote: ↑23 Jul 2018, 09:32
It got Schumacher excluded from the championship back in '97...
It's like that argument from some people claiming there was previous unfair decisions in the past so a fair decision today is actually unfair