roon wrote: ↑02 Aug 2018, 01:39
gruntguru wrote: ↑02 Aug 2018, 00:53
Electric supercharger mode should not be underestimated. Reducing exhaust back pressure by 2.5 bar will increase output by up to 35 kW. The electrical cost is perhaps 65 kW.
Beyond this, increasing the boost from 3.5 bar abs to 4.5 will further increase output (via positive intake pumping work) by up to 14 kW although at an additional electrical cost of perhaps 45 kW.
Any reason to stop at 4.5?
huge reason to stop at 4.5 (this may have been said)
there's only one AFR where the (a) combustion is optimal and (b) the heat dilution is as full as possible consistent with (a)
we might think 4.5 bar and 3.5 bar cannot both be right - unless they have the same AFR
so we would burn fuel at 100 kg/hr in electric supercharge and eg 80 kg/hr in turbocharge ?
but 4.5 supercharge work is disproportionate so even post-combustion temp may be higher than otherwise expected
so the fuel rates might be 100 kg/hr in electric supercharge and 90 kg/hr in turbocharge ?