You are only proving my point...stuartpengs wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:59All teams do it and no-one complains about it (apart from the occasional disgruntled fan who only sees it when it's done by a competitor). If Ferrari were bluffed into an earlier stop for Kimi (I don't believe they were), then they really need to work on strategy. Merc didn't technically break any rules - if they instructed Ham to pit if Kimi stays out, then it's required that the pit crew are ready and in position. Kimi pitted, they stayed out. After that it was just precaution in case Ham wanted to pit (depending on sector times). The strategy hand was dealt when Ferrari decided to pit.Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:46That's not why the rule is in place...stuartpengs wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:36
Why dummy a pitstop after Kimi had already pitted? It's not like it's going to force them to put again. After Kimi had pitted the mechanics came out in case Ham wanted to pit. It's not to force an opponent into a sub-optimal strategy as they've already pitted.
Leclerc is talented, but Ferrari would be throwing away any chance of this year's Constructors championship were they to do that.Sevach wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:58If he isn't willing to follow the orders of his employers he should be replaced with immediate effect.Restomaniac wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:42Rumours are that Raikkonen has lost his seat. How the hell will that help Vettel? Why should Raikkonen help Ferrari now?
I think you don’t often see cars (F1, GP2/3) making an inside pass on that corner from behind without exchanging some carbon bits. That inner kerb is just too unforgiving, it will push you wide. If you are not ahead then you better back out. That is exactly what Hamilton did a few laps later when Raikkonen landed the same pass on him.Harvester wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:49Well I don't think it was really checkmate. In my opinion even Hamilton knew there is high possibility of crash here. In fact I think if you take any two drivers in this situation a crash would be more likely than not.
He probably would have made that pass stick and not have run into himself
In such a tightly regulated sport, I'm half glad it isn't robustly enforced. Ultimately it shouldn't influence a competitor as far as changing strategy because they all do it and they can monitor radio transmissions of all of the teams. If someone's going to moan about it because they think it influenced their 'fave' team into making a mistake with strategy, whilst not being overtly vocal about it when it's also used by a 'fave' team, it just sounds a little hollow, and fanboyish (not that I'm accusing you of that. )Zynerji wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:06You are only proving my point...stuartpengs wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 17:59All teams do it and no-one complains about it (apart from the occasional disgruntled fan who only sees it when it's done by a competitor). If Ferrari were bluffed into an earlier stop for Kimi (I don't believe they were), then they really need to work on strategy. Merc didn't technically break any rules - if they instructed Ham to pit if Kimi stays out, then it's required that the pit crew are ready and in position. Kimi pitted, they stayed out. After that it was just precaution in case Ham wanted to pit (depending on sector times). The strategy hand was dealt when Ferrari decided to pit.
Why have the rule of it isn't enforced? Just to claim safety consciousness?
Seems RB are doing their best to make Renault look bad. Renault probably can’t wait for them to struggle with the Honda (not saying they will struggle, but I’m sure Renault would love it)
Repeating bs does not make it true toughJonoNic wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 16:57Actually Alonso created disharmony in his teams and therefore teams steered clear of him. Not the same with Verstappen... yetShrieker wrote:Verstappen what a petulant little child ! People like him and Alonso are pure undiluted cancer. He should take note how no one wanted Alonso despite his skills. But he won't; cause he's sick.
why do you think i am angry ? ......i would be angry if it seems that lewis would be one of the best drivers of all time.NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:05Now kimi helped hamilton. Love it.
You must be sooo angry !
Everyone else saw a different race to you today. Maybe watch the re run and come back for a civilised chat.
On the other hand, there were many opportunities in the last 3 years in the top 3 teams and none wanted Alonso:Andres125sx wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:27If leaving Ferrari was a right move or not is a different debate. With the benefit of hindsight it obviously wasn´t, but that does not change the fact Ferrari never steered clear of him, they were willing to keep him
NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:08I wonder what Renault have protested about with Haas. Today was the cut off date to lodge a protest. Renault are not happy about something thats been going on for a while.
Is the tow really that strong or meaningful from that far away though?NathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:00I was saying this yesterday, Vettel had a chance to be exactly how close he wanted to be to hamilton. He was about 5 seconds away from Lewis. Kimi was about 4 seconds from Seb.
They are questioning legality of HAAS floorNathanOlder wrote: ↑02 Sep 2018, 18:08I wonder what Renault have protested about with Haas. Today was the cut off date to lodge a protest. Renault are not happy about something thats been going on for a while.