Yeah,he had good pace during the opening stint and was later able to pass the Saubers on the straights. Strategy and pitwork looked suspect.
I admit a little glorified. But he flew past in the DRS zone. No real ground was being made uphill towards 130R. Take it as a positive.
Absolutely. TR chassis is way behind Renault based on 2018 races, and they have not had an update on race car since Bahrain. RedBull is just another level, they won a race without the K energy, just amazing how they go through the field. Force India i believe are best of rest in race pace.gandharva wrote: ↑07 Oct 2018, 17:27If they refine that spec 3 ICU over the last races and during winter and also improve the H and battery management (that's where they imho need to catch up now) that thing is going to shine in a RedBull next year. Watching the race today it's just insane how much better that RBR chassis is compared to the midfielders, and I think the TR chassis atm is more like a low end midfield chassis tbh...
"Post shift ignition retard settings" is delay processing of the ignition timing after shift change, and this setting is incorporated in the dial on the steering wheel.
The delay process of the ignition timing can shorten the explosion time by shifting the ignition timing behind, suppress the engine load (power and torque), and reduce the oscillation (engine and gearbox resonance) It leads to alleviation and leads to protection of the engine. That is, from the viewpoint of safety, Honda had applied for a change to the FIA.
According to Autosport the performance level was not affected. I guess also the same as, it is very strange to have only one PU in different mode as the other.Sieper wrote: ↑08 Oct 2018, 15:35Yes, but only on the Gasly car (lower power, not low power). According to Gasly they will have 2 tenths (or a bit more) more pace next qualy/race (can vary per circuit off course) but that is what he was missing compared to Hartley this race due to the more reserved mapping according to Gas himselve.