Extremely. It feels like it's more likely some kind of data problem where some data got delayed and added to the wrong lap or some other bug rather than cheating.Restomaniac wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:40Anyone else find it strange that we have 2 fuel irregularities in 1 weekend when we have had nothing before this.
Thanks a bunch Juzh! You the man!Juzh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 17:41https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/ ... sp=sharingyelistener wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 14:08Holy moly Lewis & Kimi took turn 3-5 flatout. Man this year's cars are crazy. Bottas is a loser, having to lift through turn 5.Juzh wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 10:55some laps
rai q3 lap usa 2018 1.32.307
https://streamable.com/zbsad
https://streamable.com/zbsad
ham pole with telemetry
https://streamable.com/zxikq
https://streamable.com/zxikq
alonso q1 lap usa 2018 1.35.294
https://streamable.com/4u8yb
https://streamable.com/4u8yb
bottas q3 lap usa 2018 1:32.686
https://streamable.com/oekhp
https://streamable.com/oekhp
BTW is this new app telemetry available for eariler grand prix? Would be great because we can add the missing telemtry to the previous pole onboards.
Exactly.GrandAxe wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 00:22If Lewis move on Max had happened early in the race before the formation of so many marbles, it would have been "job done, bye, everyone go home" and we would have been talking about another brilliant overtake instead.
The real point to take home though, is that Max can be overtaken in a keen battle without as much as the slightest scratch. Vettel and Bottas just don't know how.
Yes, makes no sense. Could it be that temperatures changed quickly during the day? If they somehow miscalculated the temperature than they'd be off on the fuel density.Jackles-UK wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 03:14I’m surprised that Force India would breach the fuel flow rate but even more confused as to why would Haas even fill their car with more fuel than they are legally allowed to use? What possible benefit would they garner from running heavier fuel?
They either:
- Breach the maximum fuel allowance, carry more weight for the whole race distance and still get disqualified.
- Run into the reserve for the 2kg fuel sample, fail to supply a sample to the FIA at the end of the race and still get disqualified.
- Run the car out of fuel, retire the car, blame a gearbox issue and get a free one for the next race.
Why even go through the ignominy of a disqualification?!
That would imply Max deserves a punch. He doesn't in this instance; he drove fair 'n square in the USGP.
Going by these messages Hamilton does not deserve '14 and '15 when a bad race day after a first lap spin or such was second place. Dominant car so he is undeserved? Plus, those Merc's were way, way more dominant than the Red Bull newey cars...Cannonballer wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 23:34I can't agree with you more that Newey is the reason why those 4 championships were won. But Newey is not the driver and Vettel was, so he does deserve the title in that sense. Again, I completely agree with you, Vettel's skill level is seriously lacking lately. I always felt like a bit of a Vettel hater (and Alonzo fanb0i) during his time at Redbull because I didn't think he was that great of a driver. However, every season since his last championship has made his deficiency in wheel to wheel racing, at least when compared to some of his current competitors, more obvious.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 20:32Vettel's skills are not, and have never been fitting for a 4 time world champion. That was evident even during his dominant era, those trophies should have Newey's name on them.Cannonballer wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 20:29
Vettel deserves the four championships he won, there is no debate he finished each season with the most points. However, it is now clearly debatable whether those championships were because of, or despite, his skills as a driver given the advantage the Red Bull car he was driving had over the rest of the competition. (And before anyone leaps down my throat, I haven't forgotten about Weber. But I don't think he had equal support from within the team.)
Hamilton's championships 8n the turbo hybrid era will surely have an asterisk by them given how dominant the car was. Of course it is mitigated by the no holds barred competition with Rosberg the first three years. Blah blah blah.Mamba wrote: ↑22 Oct 2018, 07:09Going by these messages Hamilton does not deserve '14 and '15 when a bad race day after a first lap spin or such was second place. Dominant car so he is undeserved? Plus, those Merc's were way, way more dominant than the Red Bull newey cars...Cannonballer wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 23:34I can't agree with you more that Newey is the reason why those 4 championships were won. But Newey is not the driver and Vettel was, so he does deserve the title in that sense. Again, I completely agree with you, Vettel's skill level is seriously lacking lately. I always felt like a bit of a Vettel hater (and Alonzo fanb0i) during his time at Redbull because I didn't think he was that great of a driver. However, every season since his last championship has made his deficiency in wheel to wheel racing, at least when compared to some of his current competitors, more obvious.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑21 Oct 2018, 20:32
Vettel's skills are not, and have never been fitting for a 4 time world champion. That was evident even during his dominant era, those trophies should have Newey's name on them.
MAMBA
Wazari wrote: There's a saying in Japan, He might be higher than testicles on a giraffe...........
A wise man will carefully calculate the chances of him being beaten to a bloody pulp before punching someone in the face.