Welcome !
I thought it was worth the read, even though in French. First part here :
https://blog.autoplus.fr/moncet/2019/01 ... -hamilton/
Welcome !
I thought you surely lost your marbles when you posted it, but you're lucky there is google translate.Marble wrote: ↑03 Feb 2019, 19:58Welcome !
I thought it was worth the read, even though in French. First part here :
https://blog.autoplus.fr/moncet/2019/01 ... -hamilton/
Translation: "The Mercedes W10 has a newly designed power unit that is affected by five years of success in the F1 world. Mercedes has invested heavily on materials and has decided on a new piston that was developed in collaboration with the Mahle.
The engineers directed by Andy Cowell have not made revolutions, but have put to good use the experiences of the hybrid era, aware that the 6-cylinder Ferrari has made huge steps forward, snatching the role of the most powerful power unit from Mercedes.
Not only that, but the unity of last year had now reached the limit of development for which the performance growth was not equal to expectations, showing some reliability problems (frequent hydraulic losses) that in the past had never been seen.
The challenge, therefore, was that of new materials: like Ferrari, Mercedes has also developed new alloys from additive manufacturing that have opened important avenues for development.
The increase in performance, in fact, is also linked to greater structural strength and weight reduction, but the Mercedes motorists have worked hard on the combustion chamber deliberating the design of a new piston that was made exclusively for the arrows silver from the Mahle, the German supplier that also collaborates with Ferrari."
To me, Mahle is an engineering company that will work with anyone. At the same time I’m sure they will have to preserve IP between their different customers. So the end solution for each will/can be slightly different. In the industry I am in some of our parts and test stands are in the same buildings as our competitors as there are simply not a lot of places that do what we need. There are firewalls (physical and network) and NDAs in place to prevent competitors from gaining access at what the other is doing. When we rely on one common part manufacturer we do have to realize the manufacturers capability will a lot of time dictate a common process or material for your part creation. It’s how you implement the technology that can make the difference. So for Mahle to be working with multiple teams in F1 they could very will have very similar technologies being used, but they could also have wide variety in their implementation in the PU could be different.
Don't get me wrong.subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2019, 15:40To me, Mahle is an engineering company that will work with anyone. At the same time I’m sure they will have to preserve IP between their different customers. So the end solution for each will/can be slightly different. In the industry I am in some of our parts and test stands are in the same buildings as our competitors as there are simply not a lot of places that do what we need. There are firewalls (physical and network) and NDAs in place to prevent competitors from gaining access at what the other is doing. When we rely on one common part manufacturer we do have to realize the manufacturers capability will a lot of time dictate a common process or material for your part creation. It’s how you implement the technology that can make the difference. So for Mahle to be working with multiple teams in F1 they could very will have very similar technologies being used, but they could also have wide variety in their implementation in the PU could be different.
Which pistons do Renault use do you know?
They have Budkowski, I'm sure they know at the very least.Mclarensenna wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 03:49Which pistons do Renault use do you know?
I wonder why Renault is the odd 1 out not using Mahle when both Ferrari and Mercedes have the best PU and both use Mahle?
I don't know for Renault.Mclarensenna wrote: ↑13 Feb 2019, 03:49Which pistons do Renault use do you know?
I wonder why Renault is the odd 1 out not using Mahle when both Ferrari and Mercedes have the best PU and both use Mahle?
The company I worked for did lots of testing for many different aerospace companies, lots of it leading edge.rgava wrote: ↑12 Feb 2019, 17:29Don't get me wrong.subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Feb 2019, 15:40To me, Mahle is an engineering company that will work with anyone. At the same time I’m sure they will have to preserve IP between their different customers. So the end solution for each will/can be slightly different. In the industry I am in some of our parts and test stands are in the same buildings as our competitors as there are simply not a lot of places that do what we need. There are firewalls (physical and network) and NDAs in place to prevent competitors from gaining access at what the other is doing. When we rely on one common part manufacturer we do have to realize the manufacturers capability will a lot of time dictate a common process or material for your part creation. It’s how you implement the technology that can make the difference. So for Mahle to be working with multiple teams in F1 they could very will have very similar technologies being used, but they could also have wide variety in their implementation in the PU could be different.
I wasn't implying anything in the sense of information flowing between competitors or same design for everyone.
This only means for me that state of the art for this generation of PUs is steel pistons, which is interesting enough.
Only doubt is which pistons technology is Renault using.