yes, these cheeky Michael Schmidt guy
There is no such thing as credible journalist in F1, they are all tabloid writers who cannot even apply the basic-est of the most basic in writing and literacy ie 5W1H.Phil wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:03But it hasn't been that same guy talking. This has been the 'gist' by other teams. Like it or not, many credible journalists who are actually at pre-testing right now talk to the teams. They have their contacts, they pick up on things. Some things more subtle than others, but nevertheless, a picture forms.
Employing this much abused method of unilaterally declaring "that's a fact" does not make you right. You know Mercedes was early adopter or originator of outwash so why and how 2019 reg change that basic principle? The logic is collapsed from the beginning.
I dont know why some people and media single out Ferrari and Sauber for the sloped down outwash config. Every single teams bar Merc and RBR run the same taperered down outwash wing, it's just about different implementation of the same philosophy.Phil wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:03There are different philosophies at play here. For one, we have high-rake vs low-rake. There have been concerns that high-rake might be problematic because the new front-wing regs make it more difficult to seal the floor. In theory, this should have helped Mercedes. Yet, from the concepts we are seeing on the Ferrari and AlfaRomeo, it seems that they at least have found a way to make it work.
Mercedes have clearly gone the other way. They have retained the low-rake concept and their front-wing follows that concept. 2018 was extremely close between them, Ferrari and RedBull. It is only reasonable to expect that this year with closer engine parity, getting the aero right will be crucial.
At least I do not dismiss possibility at all that Merc got wrong and I shouldnt be the only one, sure of course Merc can always get it wrong, Williams can dominate, Ferrari can fail, etc. The point is legitimacy of source of info and the contents of the info. You can actually get the result right from fake and false info sometimes but that does not make you right, you just got lucky. And as pointed already by others too, the contents of the info not only does not make sense, but also are self contradicting.Phil wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:03The level of denial in this topic at the sheer possibility that Mercedes may have got something wrong [vs Ferrari or RedBull] to me shows that some fans are actually worried and therefore ready to downplay anything that hints at that at being comical, absurd or blatant spam. Think again.
At some point the dominant years of every team has come to an end in the history of F1. I’m not saying it’s the case this year. We don’t know anything yet, but just because they are Mercedes doesn’t mean they will automatically get pole in Melbourne (as you stated). Of course they’ll remain top 3, regardless of what’s going on right now, but claiming they’ll dominantly be first anyway is a bit overreacting as well.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:29I think Mercedes is being Mercedes. I think they’ll come out in Melbourne and get pole, or be right in it.
It seems the internet goes crazy every time testing starts.
Not saying they’re going to dominate the field, but they’re still one of the top 3, and it’s still close. Anyone considering any other possibility is deluding themselves.
Thank you for sharing. I'm sure he's got good intentions. Information can get distorted as it gets passed from person to person. Like the game "telephone."F1Krof wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 23:34A photographer friend in Catalunya, briefed on stuff that is circulating among fellow observers.zibby43 wrote: ↑20 Feb 2019, 23:27From what source?
Also, I wasn’t criticizing you, but the info. Just wanted that to be clear. That information was a mashup of things that aren’t even accurate from a technical perspective.
The best analogy would be: it sounded like a leaked piece of fan fiction that somebody claimed to be the real leaked plot synopsis of a forthcoming blockbuster film.
You can always tell when something isn’t professional, because although it tries to draw on some known info. and attempts to hype things up, it doesn’t make sense in the end.
I don't know how much of that is true either.
Yes, domination always comes to an end, but in the past always trough a clear reason. McLaren dominated for almost eight years, before Honda dropped out and they missed the active car. Williams lost their funding and Renault. Ferrari lost their core team/tire advantage and RedBull lost their advantage of frozen engines. Mercedes got control on a level not seen in F1 before. They got their own funding, their own PU, a big team that can take a blow... Their weakest point might be Hamilton, he will leave a gap.LM10 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:39At some point the dominant years of every team has come to an end in the history of F1. I’m not saying it’s the case this year. We don’t know anything yet, but just because they are Mercedes doesn’t mean they will automatically get pole in Melbourne (as you stated). Of course they’ll remain top 3, regardless of what’s going on right now, but claiming they’ll dominantly be first anyway is a bit overreacting as well.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:29I think Mercedes is being Mercedes. I think they’ll come out in Melbourne and get pole, or be right in it.
It seems the internet goes crazy every time testing starts.
Not saying they’re going to dominate the field, but they’re still one of the top 3, and it’s still close. Anyone considering any other possibility is deluding themselves.
It could be or it couldn’t be - we will see in a few weeks/months.
How is Hamilton the weak point? What gap will he be leaving?
Jolle wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:50Yes, domination always comes to an end, but in the past always trough a clear reason. McLaren dominated for almost eight years, before Honda dropped out and they missed the active car. Williams lost their funding and Renault. Ferrari lost their core team/tire advantage and RedBull lost their advantage of frozen engines. Mercedes got control on a level not seen in F1 before. They got their own funding, their own PU, a big team that can take a blow... Their weakest point might be Hamilton, he will leave a gap.LM10 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:39At some point the dominant years of every team has come to an end in the history of F1. I’m not saying it’s the case this year. We don’t know anything yet, but just because they are Mercedes doesn’t mean they will automatically get pole in Melbourne (as you stated). Of course they’ll remain top 3, regardless of what’s going on right now, but claiming they’ll dominantly be first anyway is a bit overreacting as well.JPBD1990 wrote: ↑21 Feb 2019, 00:29I think Mercedes is being Mercedes. I think they’ll come out in Melbourne and get pole, or be right in it.
It seems the internet goes crazy every time testing starts.
Not saying they’re going to dominate the field, but they’re still one of the top 3, and it’s still close. Anyone considering any other possibility is deluding themselves.
It could be or it couldn’t be - we will see in a few weeks/months.
I'm hoping on a '86 or '91 season. nice close between two teams.
Yes. From all of the, lets say, 10 or 20, important people within the Mercedes team, he's the hardest to replace (at the moment)