British Minardi indeed.
I don't know, my understanding was that FW is team principal in name only, but that it's largely ceremonial, and he is no longer involved in actual management. Or that is what I took away from the documentary, at least.Manoah2u wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 13:06anyway, part of the problem is not that the genuine problem is claire. she's a big problem of it and needs to step down.but the biggest problem is frank, who is not capable of doing his job and is too stubborn to admit it and do what he should do: step away completely. as long as frank still is in charge, which he is, this team will not move forward.
https://www.williamsf1.com/racing/about ... e-williamsIn March 2013, Claire stepped up to the position of Deputy Team Principal for the Williams F1 Team. In this role Claire has full responsibility for the day to day running and long term development of the race team while also representing the Williams family’s majority and controlling shareholding of the Williams Group of companies on the Board.
https://www.williamsf1.com/racing/about ... -odriscollMike joined Williams as a Non-Executive Director in 2011 and became full-time Group CEO in June 2013. The newly-created role has seen Williams Martini Racing and Williams Advanced Engineering united under one management structure which enables Mike to oversee the long term strategy of the group and provide support to Founder and Team Principal Sir Frank Williams, and to work in partnership with Claire Williams, Deputy Team Principal and Commercial Director.
I got rather the vibe from that Interview, that she thinks she and her father are more importent than the rest of the team, which is quite problematic for somebody who should represent the Team to the public.GrandAxe wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 18:54The team is always a reflection of the boss. Williams was has been on a steady downward slope since the period of Frank's accident and Patrick Heads departure. Clearly they haven't been able to fill the void left by these giants - it has nothing to do with Paddy Lowe.
In interviews, Claire Williams always comes across as somewhat lost. Take this one on Williams change of livery for instance and how she not only used the word "I" several times (low self-confidence giveaway), but also seemed to be constantly searching for validation: https://www.pitpass.com/63872/Frank-lov ... new-livery
Another team boss in her position would have simply gone straight to the point of what the colours mean and that Williams expects to deliver exactly that. No added fat. It is impossible to imagine Christian Horner or Toto Wolff sounding so lost.
When the boss is lost, the team too is lost. Ugly politics and forked tongued lap dogs take wing and fill the gaps, because no one knows exactly what the boss is communicating - it might not be this bad (yet) at Williams, but it could very well be.
After googling ROKiT (and its co-founder, Jonathan Kendrick) some more, I can't say I feel optimistic about this partnership.zeph wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 19:08And finally, I heard somewhere that ROKiT's owner/director has plans to be a much more hands-on kind of sponsor, so maybe he is the guy who will initiate a takeover? Much like Stroll took over Force India ( and by the way, isn't it telling that they preferred to buy into FI rather than take control of Williams).
I'm sorry but that's just laughable, the idea that TD is going to overrule the heads of Aero and CFD on something they've been working on for years is lunacy, what does he base the decision on, gut feeling ?
Careful saying what i've been saying for 2 years now, or you'll get branded as anti-feminist or other cr*p like that by sensitive millenials.RonDennis wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 18:47Can someone also explain to me why Claire Williams is still there? She's clearly not capable of leading the team. Terrible decisions, even the godawful livery was her idea. How much more can she damage the company? Everybody that loves F1 would like to see Williams do good, but they seem to be miles of the pace and without any leadership.
That's a nice read.Shakeman wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 22:15Blog post by Peter Windsor on the Williams situation.
https://www.omologatowatches.com/blog/r ... e-williams
She is absolutely chock-full of never-ending soundbites, and they are all the same. She seems to think that repeating this stuff over and over will make things good.
Yes, I saw that posted elsewhere. Not always a fan of Peter really, and I do think his affection for Frank is absolving him of a lot of blame, but the question remains. The succession based on understanding racing at its core should have been so simple. Why? With Claire and the hangers-on what they got was a ton of nothing more than corporate bull and an endless stream of bad decisions and bad recruitment. In a way I hope the thing crashes down so Jonny can at least have a go at doing something.Shakeman wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 22:15Blog post by Peter Windsor on the Williams situation.
https://www.omologatowatches.com/blog/r ... e-williams
You're kidding? That's exactly what the TD is there to do, and no, he doesn't do it on a gut feeling he does it based on his actual expertise in engineering and aeronautics, which Paddy Lowe and many other pretenders simply do not have.Unc1eM0nty wrote: ↑07 Mar 2019, 20:54I'm sorry but that's just laughable, the idea that TD is going to overrule the heads of Aero and CFD on something they've been working on for years is lunacy, what does he base the decision on, gut feeling ?
That's meaningless claptrap and perfectly exemplifies why Williams and teams like McLaren have fallen so far. It also doesn't explain why out of necessity, and results, McLaren are recruiting a Technical Director. A real one this time. The matrix structure is having to go.There are far too many specialties involved in designing and building a car, maybe God can master them all but no mere mortal can.
Sweetheart, the drawing board is literally in his office, and it is used. The aerodynamic philosophy behind the car and the responsibility to leaf right through the rulebook and find a path through it is the sole responsibility of the TD. When two directions can be gone in the TD needs to make the decision as to which one it is, or whether they are both wrong, otherwise you get a compromise. Compromises don't work on Formula 1 cars. Once that is set the team can get to work.And I've never believed the Newey drawing board stuff, you'll be telling me Redbull don't have an Aero and CFD department next.