Timed his exit perfectly?? I personally don't think it was his choice. This debacle going on right now is his fault, no? Isnt the TD responsible for basically the car issues we are seeing at Williams right now? He's been there for a while now, so I don't see how he escapes responsibility.GrandAxe wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 15:29Sadly this is an increasingly tragic ending for one of F1's iconic teams. Even if its just a rumour, poaching bits from other teams is off the cliff, not something that one would associate with a multiple F1 record holder. First their nomination to build the mule for Pirelli (cos they're so far behind that no other team excepts them to gain an advantage), now this.SimonFW11b wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 06:51Missed Apex is reporting that Williams is approaching other teams for parts to get two cars built for Melbourne. Stroll's money is being withheld due to a dispute, Polish money not flowing.
If any of this is true, God help us.
Their management is wholly to blame.
Williams desperately needs to be taken over by a top team that can ruthlessly axe dead wood and inject fresh blood.
It would seem that Paddy Lowe timed his exit perfectly. Cars made up of all sorts of exotic bits reminds me of the wacky Races.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPw0jEIhVw
What, if any, constraints was he juggling? For example, if he is given 75% of the needed resources is it his fault he doesn’t deliver? What if he only had 50%. Reports of scavenging parts show that resources may have indeed been an issue. But, there is too much speculation and many unknowns with this situation for any outsider to be able to assign any blame.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:24Timed his exit perfectly?? I personally don't think it was his choice. This debacle going on right now is his fault, no? Isnt the TD responsible for basically the car issues we are seeing at Williams right now? He's been there for a while now, so I don't see how he escapes responsibility.GrandAxe wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 15:29Sadly this is an increasingly tragic ending for one of F1's iconic teams. Even if its just a rumour, poaching bits from other teams is off the cliff, not something that one would associate with a multiple F1 record holder. First their nomination to build the mule for Pirelli (cos they're so far behind that no other team excepts them to gain an advantage), now this.SimonFW11b wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 06:51Missed Apex is reporting that Williams is approaching other teams for parts to get two cars built for Melbourne. Stroll's money is being withheld due to a dispute, Polish money not flowing.
If any of this is true, God help us.
Their management is wholly to blame.
Williams desperately needs to be taken over by a top team that can ruthlessly axe dead wood and inject fresh blood.
It would seem that Paddy Lowe timed his exit perfectly. Cars made up of all sorts of exotic bits reminds me of the wacky Races.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPw0jEIhVw
Paddy Lowe was set to be the fall guy. He walked away before the house came down around his ears.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:24Timed his exit perfectly?? I personally don't think it was his choice. This debacle going on right now is his fault, no? Isnt the TD responsible for basically the car issues we are seeing at Williams right now? He's been there for a while now, so I don't see how he escapes responsibility.GrandAxe wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 15:29Sadly this is an increasingly tragic ending for one of F1's iconic teams. Even if its just a rumour, poaching bits from other teams is off the cliff, not something that one would associate with a multiple F1 record holder. First their nomination to build the mule for Pirelli (cos they're so far behind that no other team excepts them to gain an advantage), now this.SimonFW11b wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 06:51Missed Apex is reporting that Williams is approaching other teams for parts to get two cars built for Melbourne. Stroll's money is being withheld due to a dispute, Polish money not flowing.
If any of this is true, God help us.
Their management is wholly to blame.
Williams desperately needs to be taken over by a top team that can ruthlessly axe dead wood and inject fresh blood.
It would seem that Paddy Lowe timed his exit perfectly. Cars made up of all sorts of exotic bits reminds me of the wacky Races.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPw0jEIhVw
What is the role of the TD then? Don't they have to work with the money they have and adjust accordingly? Isn't that a major role of the job? Didn't Lotus walk the tight budget line really well not too long ago? Maybe Paddy should have considered that. Do all TD's except Paddy have 100% of their budget to work with, he is an exception at Williams, so he escapes culpability? Whut. How does that make sense? Should not the TD be held to account for his job responsibilities?subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:38What, if any, constraints was he juggling? For example, if he is given 75% of the needed resources is it his fault he doesn’t deliver? What if he only had 50%. Reports of scavenging parts show that resources may have indeed been an issue. But, there is too much speculation and many unknowns with this situation for any outsider to be able to assign any blame.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:24Timed his exit perfectly?? I personally don't think it was his choice. This debacle going on right now is his fault, no? Isnt the TD responsible for basically the car issues we are seeing at Williams right now? He's been there for a while now, so I don't see how he escapes responsibility.GrandAxe wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 15:29
Sadly this is an increasingly tragic ending for one of F1's iconic teams. Even if its just a rumour, poaching bits from other teams is off the cliff, not something that one would associate with a multiple F1 record holder. First their nomination to build the mule for Pirelli (cos they're so far behind that no other team excepts them to gain an advantage), now this.
Their management is wholly to blame.
Williams desperately needs to be taken over by a top team that can ruthlessly axe dead wood and inject fresh blood.
It would seem that Paddy Lowe timed his exit perfectly. Cars made up of all sorts of exotic bits reminds me of the wacky Races.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWPw0jEIhVw
He obviously told you that...Manoah2u wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:34Paddy stepped away to keep honor to himself. he got scapegoated by treacherous williams egocentrics and decided he'd have none of it, especially since their financial situation will not give them any options. pretty sure they'd start attacking paddy's salary check soon too and claiming that another TD would have saved them money and they'd have a car by melbourne, as they're so low to never look into the mirror.
the curtains are falling.
and still, they're not taking appropraite action, and i'd be pretty surprised if they did. hence this team will go under. well, in f1 the very least. they probably will go to formula E or WEC.
I’m sure the role of the TD is different at each team and I have no idea what Paddy was promised when he was hired but that was not my point at all and I wasn’t comparing Williams to Lotus... I don’t see how you got there with what I said. Yes, leaders are supposed to be lean. But if you are in a situation where the given resources are simply not enough isn’t it the fault of the person who if responsible for giving, or allowing, those resources who f’d up? He’s not the top dog in the organization, I’m just saying he may be a victim or the robber, it’s hard to tell which at this point.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:49What is the role of the TD then? Don't they have to work with the money they have and adjust accordingly? Isn't that a major role of the job? Didn't Lotus walk the tight budget line really well not too long ago? Maybe Paddy should have considered that. Do all TD's except Paddy have 100% of their budget to work with, he is an exception at Williams, so he escapes culpability? Whut. How does that make sense? Should not the TD be held to account for his job responsibilities?subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:38What, if any, constraints was he juggling? For example, if he is given 75% of the needed resources is it his fault he doesn’t deliver? What if he only had 50%. Reports of scavenging parts show that resources may have indeed been an issue. But, there is too much speculation and many unknowns with this situation for any outsider to be able to assign any blame.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:24
Timed his exit perfectly?? I personally don't think it was his choice. This debacle going on right now is his fault, no? Isnt the TD responsible for basically the car issues we are seeing at Williams right now? He's been there for a while now, so I don't see how he escapes responsibility.
Look I fully understand that PL may have been hindered with a messed up budget and factors he can't control. I get that. But from what reports are saying (and yes they may be wrong), the car isn't even within technical regulation, and last time I checked that was 100% the fault of the technical director. So the comment he "made his escape" just rubbed me the wrong way because I felt like it was giving him a pass. I like Williams to much to let that go, so that's why I replied.subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 20:22I’m sure the role of the TD is different at each team and I have no idea what Paddy was promised when he was hired but that was not my point at all and I wasn’t comparing Williams to Lotus... I don’t see how you got there with what I said. Yes, leaders are supposed to be lean. But if you are in a situation where the given resources are simply not enough isn’t it the fault of the person who if responsible for giving, or allowing, those resources who f’d up? He’s not the top dog in the organization, I’m just saying he may be a victim or the robber, it’s hard to tell which at this point.Chuckjr wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:49What is the role of the TD then? Don't they have to work with the money they have and adjust accordingly? Isn't that a major role of the job? Didn't Lotus walk the tight budget line really well not too long ago? Maybe Paddy should have considered that. Do all TD's except Paddy have 100% of their budget to work with, he is an exception at Williams, so he escapes culpability? Whut. How does that make sense? Should not the TD be held to account for his job responsibilities?subcritical71 wrote: ↑12 Mar 2019, 19:38
What, if any, constraints was he juggling? For example, if he is given 75% of the needed resources is it his fault he doesn’t deliver? What if he only had 50%. Reports of scavenging parts show that resources may have indeed been an issue. But, there is too much speculation and many unknowns with this situation for any outsider to be able to assign any blame.
Well, if as said he has a good stake in Williams shares,