Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
they are 4 and 5 seconds off the pace. how on earth do you even remotely think they are a challenge.
Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
Read again. It's clearly sarcasm.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:58Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
they are 4 and 5 seconds off the pace. how on earth do you even remotely think they are a challenge.
my bad!marvin78 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:59Read again. It's clearly sarcasm.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:58Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
they are 4 and 5 seconds off the pace. how on earth do you even remotely think they are a challenge.
Or he wrote the speech for Toto Wolf.
Mate any reason for this statement?Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
Interesting, I suppose the soft degradation is quite a bit then, and the hard is just too hard, leaving the medium as the much faster race tyre? If so, p11 is going to be a coveted spot, and Ferrari surely will try to go through q2 with that tyre.
Well Alfa Romeo looked good so perhaps is just a balance problema(hopefully).djones wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 10:21I was fully expecting to see the news this morning and Ferrari be 1-2 in both sessions a with a half second lead.
Instead they are eating tyres and noticeably off the pace.
Worst thing is the Mercs did not even look settled so have time to come.
So much for all the talk of low rake being the wrong choice and the front wing being last generation
Hit. Nail. Head.marvin78 wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:59Read again. It's clearly sarcasm.Manoah2u wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:58Schuttelberg wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 09:47Mercedes are not the fastest. Ferrari and Red Bull are faster and even the Williams might be a challenge.
they are 4 and 5 seconds off the pace. how on earth do you even remotely think they are a challenge.
Or he wrote the speech for Toto Wolf.
Don't disagree with that either, Lewis has a way to pull a rabbit out of a hat when it comes time for the final runs in Q3.Hammerfist wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 08:53Yeah but when one team sets the fastest time in FP1 and FP2 it's usually because they are fastest. I don't think the gap is what it looks like in FP2 though. It is probably closer to what we saw in FP1, but Merc has got the big difference maker in Hamilton, who absolutely loves this track...kaido wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 08:12Do you really think times for FP2 are representative of the order.Hammerfist wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 08:04I know it is still early, but where are all the experts that swore Ferrari had a sizeable advantage? Merc looks like they are going to dominate here. Although we have not seen the best of Verstappen yet. What the hell is Ferrari doing in FP2?
In the past Ferrari had a habit of setting fastest time in FP, then coming to qualifying they were out pace by the MERC. Less showboating and more focusing on their program.
Indeed, he just need to wait for Albon to crash and safety car to come outRingleheim wrote: ↑15 Mar 2019, 10:44As long as Vettel is near the front, it doesn't matter if he misses pole anyway.