Although it is well said by somebody that making fast car more reliable is much easier than making reliable car faster.humble sabot wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 02:25One big plus is that they did both finish the race in fully running condition. Can't fight for points if you DNF.
humble sabot wrote: ↑08 Apr 2019, 23:41I've been kind of obsessing over the "illegal" mirrors, and I'm not quite sure I understand why they were considered non-compliant. The explanations don't add up IMO. https://www.formulapassion.it/wp-conten ... 1-2019.jpg
(from https://www.formulapassion.it/motorspor ... 21816.html )
It is flawed only when have figured out the flawmarcush. wrote: ↑09 Apr 2019, 12:45One has to realise how destructive it is to earmark your current campaign car as fundentally flawed and not correctable.
How would you be able to find workarounds and exploit the thimg to the max when your thought always is :nah ,its a dog and it cannot be quick amd we all know why...
From the perspective of racing it's definitely destructive, from the point of view of running a business/turning a profit it would make sense. Not spending money on developing what they viewed as a dog of a car last year allowed them to post a profit as a result. Insane as that is to me.marcush. wrote: ↑09 Apr 2019, 12:45One has to realise how destructive it is to earmark your current campaign car as fundentally flawed and not correctable.
How would you be able to find workarounds and exploit the thimg to the max when your thought always is :nah ,its a dog and it cannot be quick amd we all know why...
What I've read to date says that a challenge came from Racing Point - on the supposition that they thought the driver couldn't see. Variously the mirror being multiple parts and being curved, neither of which are borne out by that image I linked, clearly. I've not heard of either Russell Or Kubica complaining. The grounds on which it was ruled were something to do with the two part attachment, and a reading saying that they may not have an aerodynamic influence.
Agree. The bargeboards and leading edge of the floor are Persons Of Interest that should be immediately taken into a wind tunnel for thorough questioning.ringo wrote: ↑11 Apr 2019, 02:31https://imgr4.auto-motor-und-sport.de/W ... 436721.jpg
I think the crime was commited in this area of the car. It may need to be redesigned completely, along with the floor.