Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.gibells wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 09:27Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.
Give them time and they will make even more strides.
All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
We can all imagine an all electric f1 car that beats the ICE but it would last 4 laps and be a time attack(have not done the math on this, just a guesstimate), or some kinda sprint. There are limits on wh/kg with batteries, hard to beat gasoline in the 4 wheel form factor. Checkout Isle of Man electric, that may be a better form factor to showcase the direct comparison. Electric is awesome can it can be anywhere...it motivated me to get into ebikes, dirtbikes get kicked out of the spare lot because of noise.Jolle wrote: ↑23 May 2019, 18:16You downvoted me because my analysis isn’t accurate? Which part?Andres125sx wrote: ↑23 May 2019, 17:49So any series wich is not extremelly fast is pathetic and cannot look good at any track?Jolle wrote: ↑22 May 2019, 17:45
Performance wise Formula E is actually quite pathetic. 200kW in race trim with 900 kg of mass, that’s not far off reasonably priced road cars. The only reason it looks good on track because of the narrow short road courses and the very hard tires, which makes it look like they race on ice.
Formula Ford is pathetic? WTCC is pathetic?
Sorry Jolle, but your bias is too obvious
I've been corrected by Mark Priestley on his blog before. Whilst the batteries and chassis are spec, everything behind that, i.e. powertrain, is open to team design. The feeling I get is that this opening up will extend forward in the future. Besides, based on previous discussions of weight, power & aero etc, it's a bit of a waste of money to prototype other elements until aero really comes into play.Jolle wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 09:58Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.gibells wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 09:27Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.
Give them time and they will make even more strides.
All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
And Formula E is innovating, but for me not really on the technical side but a new way to market racing. The electric power makes it possible to go places where no races could be held and proven itself to be the main competitor for the WEC series and DTM for car manufacturers to put up a show. But, on the technical side, it’s a spec series so there are no investments from for instance battery manufacturers to come with better tech or new developments. It’s all locked in tenders.
So farJolle wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 09:58Oh I love electric racing. I was astonished when I tested a race Tesla roadster years ago (I supplied electric mopeds to the Zandvoort circuit and a lot of racing teams and my company sponsored a car in the diesel cup), the throttle response was by far the best of any race car I drove and I follow the electric TT motor racing.gibells wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 09:27Despite is my misgivings about going electric, I do think that racing is a fantastic way to develop battery tech and drivetrains. What no-one is mentioning is that the Gen2 cars are able to go the entire race distance, rather than embarrassingly changing cars halfway through ala Gen1.
Give them time and they will make even more strides.
All this talk about series hate makes out like you can only support one franchise. Reality is if you're on F1T you love and watch it all.
And Formula E is innovating, but for me not really on the technical side but a new way to market racing. The electric power makes it possible to go places where no races could be held and proven itself to be the main competitor for the WEC series and DTM for car manufacturers to put up a show. But, on the technical side, it’s a spec series so there are no investments from for instance battery manufacturers to come with better tech or new developments. It’s all locked in tenders.
Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional trackJolle wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 08:19Indeed, Wikipedia has the wrong times. But still far off 7 seconds.
It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around SpaAndres125sx wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 18:41Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track
45 minutes of battery in your opinion would provide juice for 7 laps? I see maths are not your field NathanNathanOlder wrote: ↑29 May 2019, 21:45It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around SpaAndres125sx wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 18:41Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track
And I see you have not even a fraction of the intelligence you are trying yo have us believe.Andres125sx wrote: ↑30 May 2019, 07:4545 minutes of battery in your opinion would provide juice for 7 laps? I see maths are not your field NathanNathanOlder wrote: ↑29 May 2019, 21:45It probably would be about 7 seconds on any traditional track, but they wont go there yet as they will be doing 7 laps before they run out of juice and doing 7 minute laps around SpaAndres125sx wrote: ↑24 May 2019, 18:41
Yes watching the video again it looks like race laps, so we can´t know if some of them was saving more energy that the other one increasing the gap. Anycase 3.5 seconds is still a huge improvement on a 50 seconds lap, it will be more than 7 seconds on any traditional track