![Image](https://i.imgur.com/KxdM48a.png)
That SC was absolutely necessary - you can't have people in a gravel trap at the run-off area of a heavy braking zone ffs
definitely should have been a VSC, I thought this was the whole reason to have it in the first place!?zeph wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 23:44I’m watching the race now, I ff-ing hate race control for that totally UNNECESSARY safety car. Giovinazzi’s car was lightyears away from the track, what BS.
This really screws up Bottas and Leclerc who were both doing a stellar job against Hamilton and Verstappen respectively.
VSC would have been just fine. still would have handed Ham the lead though.RZS10 wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:02Wasn't he stuck somewhere at the exit of corner 16 with the recovery crew working roughly in the area where Verstappen ended up after being taken out by Vettel?
https://i.imgur.com/KxdM48a.png
That SC was absolutely necessary - you can't have people in a gravel trap at the run-off area of a heavy braking zone ffs
My comment regarding safety car made absolutely no mention of a single comment about Bottas. Don't put words into my mouth.komninosm wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:57I'm pretty sure you said:ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:39Bottas was screwed by strategy not SC. I never said Bottas was robbed by the safety car.siskue2005 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:23
Bottas would have been overtaken by Lewis without the SC... Bottas surely needed two stops, while Lewis was out there stretching it already to a one stopper for him, so Lewis overtaking him was inevitable. we were robbed of a fight between those two with the SC
Max was robbed by Vettel. Bottas, well, by his own team and strategy.
Hamilton was gifted an easy win without a fight at the end.
Leclerc assumed 3rd with Max getting punted by Vettel.
Luck of safety car. Never mentioned Bottas strategy. Besides Bottas only has himself to blame, he ruined his tires trying to defend from a faster (more deserving of the win) Hamilton and had to pit early and go for 2 stops.ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 18:26It could have been an EPIC British GP but no, it was another one determined by "luck" of safety car and how it completely rearranges the competitive order. Giovinazzi again showing his quality and effectively ruining a great race and ofcourse Vettel's late desperation move also was just that. Trying way too hard and late into that corner.
An anti-climactic end that I reckon many of the crowd felt robbed.
Also Leclerc was screwed by the safety car since Ferrari forgot to call him in to pit and he lost a place with pitting the next lap.
It's obvious you're a Verstappen fan, but please keep it real. Yes, Vettel was at fault for hitting Verstappen, but there was no way in hell Hamilton was losing this race based on speed alone. Even Bottas probably had better race pace than Verstappen if needed.
They could have gone medium - hard from the outset. Going medium medium soft was always going to be a stretch. You doom the driver to a second stop.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 20:38Sorry, but Bottas wasn't screwed by strategy. The team pitted him on schedule before the safety car happened. Hamilton was lucky because the safety car happened as he was approaching the pit lane entry. But he'd made that luck by staying fast on an older tyre.ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:39
Bottas was screwed by strategy not SC. I never said Bottas was robbed by the safety car.
Max was robbed by Vettel. Bottas, well, by his own team and strategy.
Hamilton was gifted an easy win without a fight at the end.
Leclerc assumed 3rd with Max getting punted by Vettel.
How about your comment about the fans feeling robbed? As somebody who was there I can tell you that I found and spoke to nobody who felt that way.ispano6 wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:19My comment regarding safety car made absolutely no mention of a single comment about Bottas. Don't put words into my mouth.komninosm wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:57I'm pretty sure you said:ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:39
Bottas was screwed by strategy not SC. I never said Bottas was robbed by the safety car.
Max was robbed by Vettel. Bottas, well, by his own team and strategy.
Hamilton was gifted an easy win without a fight at the end.
Leclerc assumed 3rd with Max getting punted by Vettel.
Luck of safety car. Never mentioned Bottas strategy. Besides Bottas only has himself to blame, he ruined his tires trying to defend from a faster (more deserving of the win) Hamilton and had to pit early and go for 2 stops.ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 18:26It could have been an EPIC British GP but no, it was another one determined by "luck" of safety car and how it completely rearranges the competitive order. Giovinazzi again showing his quality and effectively ruining a great race and ofcourse Vettel's late desperation move also was just that. Trying way too hard and late into that corner.
An anti-climactic end that I reckon many of the crowd felt robbed.
Also Leclerc was screwed by the safety car since Ferrari forgot to call him in to pit and he lost a place with pitting the next lap.
It's obvious you're a Verstappen fan, but please keep it real. Yes, Vettel was at fault for hitting Verstappen, but there was no way in hell Hamilton was losing this race based on speed alone. Even Bottas probably had better race pace than Verstappen if needed.
The guy in front generally gets to decide unless it stops an undercut from normally position 3. Actually in this season so far it could easily be argued that Bottas has had the favourable calls in that regard.ispano6 wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:28They could have gone medium - hard from the outset. Going medium medium soft was always going to be a stretch. You doom the driver to a second stop.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 20:38Sorry, but Bottas wasn't screwed by strategy. The team pitted him on schedule before the safety car happened. Hamilton was lucky because the safety car happened as he was approaching the pit lane entry. But he'd made that luck by staying fast on an older tyre.ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:39
Bottas was screwed by strategy not SC. I never said Bottas was robbed by the safety car.
Max was robbed by Vettel. Bottas, well, by his own team and strategy.
Hamilton was gifted an easy win without a fight at the end.
Leclerc assumed 3rd with Max getting punted by Vettel.
Btw, who makes the call at Mercedes for who pits first?
Watch a replay of Bottas wife and his side of the garage afterwards. And the replay of when Vettel took out Max. See the reaction of the crowd there? Arms up in the air. Don't forget, a lot of these teams are based right next door and all their families are there rooting their teams. So don't go saying nobody felt that way because that simply isn't true. Hamilton and British fans got what they came for so that's good for them. Plus I said many, not everyone.Restomaniac wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:30How about your comment about the fans feeling robbed? As somebody who was there I can feel you that I found nobody who felt that way.ispano6 wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:19My comment regarding safety car made absolutely no mention of a single comment about Bottas. Don't put words into my mouth.komninosm wrote: ↑14 Jul 2019, 19:57
I'm pretty sure you said:
Luck of safety car. Never mentioned Bottas strategy. Besides Bottas only has himself to blame, he ruined his tires trying to defend from a faster (more deserving of the win) Hamilton and had to pit early and go for 2 stops.
Also Leclerc was screwed by the safety car since Ferrari forgot to call him in to pit and he lost a place with pitting the next lap.
It's obvious you're a Verstappen fan, but please keep it real. Yes, Vettel was at fault for hitting Verstappen, but there was no way in hell Hamilton was losing this race based on speed alone. Even Bottas probably had better race pace than Verstappen if needed.
Bottas stated that he and his engineers decided to 2-stop. Hamilton and his engineers decided to split the strategy. Hamilton's engineers got it right this time.
If someone is consistently "lucky" then the chances are that luck is not especially involved.
Aw shucks, Hamilton is the best driver in F1, no doubt. Not saying he didn’t deserve it.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:50If someone is consistently "lucky" then the chances are that luck is not especially involved.
Safety car didnt' ruin his strategy in reality. He wanted to two stop, Hamilton was actually faster despite keeping his tires going for longer. Bottas has tire wear issues anywhere with almost any level of tire wear. Currently the only reason he's somewhat competitive with Ham at some tracks are low deg tires.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 00:47Bottas stated that he and his engineers decided to 2-stop. Hamilton and his engineers decided to split the strategy. Hamilton's engineers got it right this time.
Mercedes give first stop priority to the leading of the two drivers.
Mercedes did not ruin Bottas's race with their strategy, the safety car did that.