Bottas deserve to win?
SC was a joke? Did you even watch the race?
Strategy? Bottas ruined his own tires trying to block Hamilton. It's his own fault he had to pit early. So much for deserving to win...
Bottas deserve to win?
2. HARD is slower than MED often...ispano6 wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 09:291.Explain the reasoning for "splitting" strategies (to make the racing interesting is BS).Just_a_fan wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 09:18The strategy meeting is both drivers and their race engineers sitting down together. Both knew what the other was doing and both went their way.
Or are you suggesting that the management came in and said "let's screw Bottas, just for kicks and giggles"?
2.In what way is MED-MED-(SOFT/HARD) better than MED-HARD-(MED/SOFT)?
3.Which of the two has the option for a one stopper? Hrmmm.
yeah that really really bugs me. I like Crofty, but that is 1 thing I hate, its childish. As for his over excited rants, that's kind of his job, and I said previously, he's nowhere near as bad as James Allen, so people need to zip it, when they say he's over the top.Justthatek wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 19:58Just about to watch the race replay again on sky and Crofty constantly saying "milliseconds" really?!?
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
After watching this in slow motion like you say, you have a point mate. Max moves both ways mirroring Vettel, thats a fact.izzy wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 23:19yes you can see why each driver did what they did. Look at this though, for my point of view. Slow it down to .25 speed and watch at 26s as they come back into view after the dip. Seb has just finished his dummy to the right, and so Max is towards the middle of the track. Seb goes to the left, aiming for the space, and Max mirrors himrogazilla wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 22:14
Agreed that Seb was going faster and he does seem committed to the inside move on Max. All of this happen in split second, Still Seb was the car behind. As the following car, you can predict the car in front would go back on racing line to make the corner and try the inside move but you also have to be prepared for the lead car to defend the inside. Hence it is still Seb's job to recognize that Max is defending inside. In fact I do think he realized that and as he locks wheels, as mentioned earlier likely being so close to Max, reduced downforce, he ram into the back of Max.
In my view, Max' defending inside as he is slower and already on the left side of the track. Going back to racing line to make the left hand turn is just opening up the door for VET who has the speed that's going to take the inside (what Max would have done in Vet's position). By blocking inside and forcing VET to take the outside line or slow down following Max through the corner is really the only way for Max to defend. Look at some of Sainz' on board and may others in this race, blocking the inside at this corner is what most choose to do also.
That second move of Max is what makes it his fault imo. He closes off the space, only by 10% or whatever, but it's enough and now Seb can't possibly stop in time, he goes right to avoid wheel on wheel and Max goes right a bit too so it ends up just looking like Seb drove into the back of him. But Max has moved left, too late. But quite subtlely. It's all just like Baku but not as obvious
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZeAH-V_6MjQ
Juzh wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 21:29here you go. fastest lap with telemetry and no abnoxious commentary
https://streamable.com/984e8
https://streamable.com/984e8
langedweil wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 03:45Don't agree with you; because of his hardware VES always (well most of the times, without incidents or DNF's) had to extract at least 110% from his hardware to maybe, maybe have a chance on a go .. whereas the Ferrari's could do with 100% and the Mercs at times even with 90% or lower.
LEC's pass was absolutely very nice en well done, totally agree, but it wasn't just racecraft alone.
Again, don't agree ..and think about this small statistic - Leclerc 31 GP starts, Verstappen 91 GP starts, but from the action on the track one would get the feeling that it should be the other way around, isn't it ?
In my humble opinion and while knowing perfectly well it's not done to make the comparison (but nevertheless I do): I see the contoures alike a Prost/Senna era. One as the calm, calculated and almost boring Prost (but losing his head every now and then), and one as the racer that always aims way above 100% (but does fail at times).
I'd say there is no need comparing the guys, or put one above the other. Let's just enjoy for yrs to come, hopefully with guys like Nor, Alb, Rus in the mix as well. Finally I saw some racing again ...
Like I said previous, this incident puts Max related discussions in perspective.NathanOlder wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 00:26
After watching this in slow motion like you say, you have a point mate. Max moves both ways mirroring Vettel, thats a fact.
for me it was too quick and too tight to blame either more than the other. I feel its more a racing incident after seeing this.
p. s if they fell Vettel is at fsult, then Vettels penalty was a joke, after they decided to penalise him, a 10 sec penalty does nothing at all.
TBH it’s not just the mistakes. It’s his whole demeanour.
Maybe its just the new track surface, after 52 laps by 17 cars was done, the track was properly rubbered in.yelistener wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 01:18Juzh wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 21:29here you go. fastest lap with telemetry and no abnoxious commentary
https://streamable.com/984e8
https://streamable.com/984e8
Flat through Copse with 33-lap-old hards that's ridiculous. And his speeds through other corners were no less than last year's pole. It's 1.5s slower than 2018 pole only because of straight line speeds and no DRS. All these leads to the conclusion that 2019 pole could've been a lot faster.
BTW, was Bottas' onboard on T-cam when he was doing his fastest lap? If so, is it possible for you to do that lap with telemetry? Sorry for asking for a lot. They have the incredible pace in the race and it's a shame that it was not there in quali.