2022 Aerodynamic Regulations Thread

Here are our CFD links and discussions about aerodynamics, suspension, driver safety and tyres. Please stick to F1 on this forum.
User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

I thought the low nose had been branded as dangerous ?
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Big Tea wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 12:03
I thought the low nose had been branded as dangerous ?
The nose isn't any lower than now, or won't be significantly lower (~25mm at most), just the front wing rises to meet it.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 12:04
Big Tea wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 12:03
I thought the low nose had been branded as dangerous ?
The nose isn't any lower than now, or won't be significantly lower (~25mm at most), just the front wing rises to meet it.
Thanks.
I thought as it had been mentioned they would take advantage of the change to get it higher.
Not that I want it higher.
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
Thunder
Moderator
Joined: 06 Feb 2013, 09:50
Location: Germany

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

FrukostScones wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 11:37

I don't care about average joe. I care about my (our) passion.
If they mandate a standart side pod air intake shape (that is what I am reading), that would be pretty damning.
Lookalike cars, no thanks!
I merely wanted to say that Ross Brawn's Job isn't just to satisfy the "Nerds". We need to understand that.
turbof1 wrote: YOU SHALL NOT......STALLLLL!!!
#aerogollum

User avatar
djos
113
Joined: 19 May 2006, 06:09
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

I love the development race in F1 but this is absolutely the right direction imo. I'm excited!
"In downforce we trust"

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Thunder wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 12:08
FrukostScones wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 11:37

I don't care about average joe. I care about my (our) passion.
If they mandate a standart side pod air intake shape (that is what I am reading), that would be pretty damning.
Lookalike cars, no thanks!
I merely wanted to say that Ross Brawn's Job isn't just to satisfy the "Nerds". We need to understand that.
I would say there are a lot of jobs in F1 dependent on that talent having a job to do. Mercedes have something like 300 in their aero department, down to 50-100 at the smaller teams. If they don't have anything to do they're out of a job. There's already fears of massive layoffs if the budget cap comes in, Horner has repeatedly said as much.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

User avatar
ME4ME
79
Joined: 19 Dec 2014, 16:37

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

jjn9128 wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 13:01
I would say there are a lot of jobs in F1 dependent on that talent having a job to do. Mercedes have something like 300 in their aero department, down to 50-100 at the smaller teams. If they don't have anything to do they're out of a job. There's already fears of massive layoffs if the budget cap comes in, Horner has repeatedly said as much.
Teams have been screaming for years that Formula 1 is unsustainable. Drivers have been screaming that they can't race in dirty air. Media and fans have been screaming that the performance gaps have been too great. Now if some engineers/aerodynamicist have to be placed elsewhere either within their current company or at a backmarker team which potentially does have room within the budget cap than so be it.

User avatar
AMG.Tzan
44
Joined: 24 Jan 2013, 01:35
Location: Greece

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

I wouldn't say that cars today look all the same! Ferrari and Mercedes have nothing similar...specially their radiators are way different and same goes for their noses both of which are key design differences when comparing two cars!

On the other hand there are Red Bull, McLaren, Renault, Force India who all have the same radiators and the same noses...

So i think there must be some kind of freedom in those two areas because they are both key areas to differentiate two cars!

I like the 2021 rules...i've been asking for ground effect for years now and tbh i still can't understand why they never used it all those years! Thankfully they get rid of the plank...such an ugly and silly solution! Cars before 1994 where so low to the ground, they looked really great!! Also the huge diffusers of the ground effect cars look so nice! =D>
"The only rule is there are no rules" - Aristotle Onassis

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 14:06
I wouldn't say that cars today look all the same! Ferrari and Mercedes have nothing similar...specially their radiators are way different and same goes for their noses both of which are key design differences when comparing two cars!

On the other hand there are Red Bull, McLaren, Renault, Force India who all have the same radiators and the same noses...

So i think there must be some kind of freedom in those two areas because they are both key areas to differentiate two cars!

I like the 2021 rules...i've been asking for ground effect for years now and tbh i still can't understand why they never used it all those years! Thankfully they get rid of the plank...such an ugly and silly solution! Cars before 1994 where so low to the ground, they looked really great!! Also the huge diffusers of the ground effect cars look so nice! =D>
The plank is still there. It just has a different shape and starts further back. They've got rid of the silly plate/tea tray.
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

AMG.Tzan wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 14:06

I like the 2021 rules...i've been asking for ground effect for years now and tbh i still can't understand why they never used it all those years! Thankfully they get rid of the plank...such an ugly and silly solution! Cars before 1994 where so low to the ground, they looked really great!! Also the huge diffusers of the ground effect cars look so nice! =D>
So you don't understand that the current cars are ground effect cars?
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Downvote rather than discuss. Ok, cool.
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

ENGINE TUNER
ENGINE TUNER
25
Joined: 29 Nov 2016, 18:07

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

djos wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 12:22
I love the development race in F1 but this is absolutely the right direction imo. I'm excited!
We need a development race in f1, just not so much in aero, more so in electrification, and novel tech for the ICE and crazy stuff like cvt transmissions, laser ignition, rotary valve trane, or electromagnetic valve actuation. Stuff like the Williams flywheel.

Maplesoup
Maplesoup
18
Joined: 18 Jan 2019, 19:25

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 14:36
AMG.Tzan wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 14:06

I like the 2021 rules...i've been asking for ground effect for years now and tbh i still can't understand why they never used it all those years! Thankfully they get rid of the plank...such an ugly and silly solution! Cars before 1994 where so low to the ground, they looked really great!! Also the huge diffusers of the ground effect cars look so nice! =D>
So you don't understand that the current cars are ground effect cars?
I'd argue that nothing is a ground effect car unless it has a fully sealed floor like the old lotus.

Until then they are similar utilizing some ground effect.

User avatar
jjn9128
778
Joined: 02 May 2017, 23:53

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

Maplesoup wrote:
17 Jul 2019, 16:48
I'd argue that nothing is a ground effect car unless it has a fully sealed floor like the old lotus.

Until then they are similar utilizing some ground effect.
Then your definition of ground effect is wrong. To an aerodynamicist the "ground effect" is simply the increase in normal force (lift/downforce) from proximity to the ground. Current F1 cars are very much in ground effect!
#aerogandalf
"There is one big friend. It is downforce. And once you have this it’s a big mate and it’s helping a lot." Robert Kubica

PABLOEING
PABLOEING
15
Joined: 12 May 2012, 10:39

Re: 2021 Aero Thread

Post

In the engine side.....¿someone know the rules in 2021?....¿more fuel per hour......more engines in a year?