I disagree. Ferrari realises they need to change something in their approach.
I'd take Bottas in a HB. He's shown he can beat Hamilton. He's just not been lucky.Polarit wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 02:06Ferrari's future is Leclrec. He's showing he has what it takes and the fight and character to not worry about a 4 time world champion next to him. They don't need Max.
Hamilton isn't going anywhere and tbh I don't see Mercedes anytime soon putting a driver who may upset the balance next to him. Potentially Ocon.... maybe they'll bring in Russell with strict orders but I think with those top records in sight, they want the brand recognition and accolades of the best ever and tbh they've both deserved them.
Red Bull will do everything in their power to keep Max. I think though after Hamilton in theory equals or breaks records they'll go all out for Max and the next generation or they may pull out and call it job done.
-------
All the arguments about young drivers and Hamilton are silly. He's going to be a 6 time world champion and hold nearly every record in the book. I don't think there's a driver current who can beat him over a season. Too much experience and he's still got speed.
Alonso worked... the team failed him repeatedly back then. In his 5 years I don't remember him making 1 gaffe.f1universe wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 17:21We will see if Leclerc still works after 5 years without a title.
Alonso did not have a SF70H or SF71H at his disposal, both of which were sure shot championship winners. When they had a great driver, the equipment was weak and when they built the right equipment, the driver is weak.diffuser wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 18:25Alonso worked... the team failed him repeatedly back then. In his 5 years I don't remember him making 1 gaffe.f1universe wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 17:21We will see if Leclerc still works after 5 years without a title.
Honestly LeClerc doesn't need anybody but Alonso would push him.
Question: How were they sure title winners? The SF70-H had a spell of horrid reliability that opened the point gap into an unassailable deficit, and the SF71 had a botched update package in Singapore that took the car from a small percentage ahead of Mercedes to behind Red Bull at some of the Asian rounds. Saying either car would've won the titles, even without Seb's multiple mistakes in 2018, is laughable.GPR -A wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 18:44Alonso did not have a SF70H or SF71H at his disposal, both of which were sure shot championship winners. When they had a great driver, the equipment was weak and when they built the right equipment, the driver is weak.diffuser wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 18:25Alonso worked... the team failed him repeatedly back then. In his 5 years I don't remember him making 1 gaffe.f1universe wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 17:21
We will see if Leclerc still works after 5 years without a title.
Honestly LeClerc doesn't need anybody but Alonso would push him.
In the current context, Ricciardo would be the best choice for Ferrari and he has a clause in his contract that would allow him to leave Renault if Mercedes or Ferrari offer come by. Bottas has one lap pace, but is too weak in races and is a passenger in the on track battles. Ricciardo is equally fast on one lap and is fare more intelligent, clean and ruthless in on track battles.
First and foremost, Ferrari need to fix the problem of their strategists. They need to put people who can outsmart the competition with out-of-the box thinking in strategy and read the race in shrewd and aggressive manner. Their strategy team is too weak and so much centered on Vettel that they lose out on Leclerc, who is clearly the better driver. The amount of stupid disregard they have shown to Leclerc's overall quali/race strategy is downright ugly.
Once they get Ricciardo, they should have two high quality strategy teams to assist both their drivers, lead by a highly decisive leader as their chief strategist. Currently, they are way too weak.
They don't need Hamilton or Alonso or John Cena to lead them. If they can fix their fundamental efficiency problems, they can win the championships with Lec and Ric.
I read somewhere a few weeks ago (from a reliable source) that the problem lies in making their simulations and wind tunnel testing more representative or real-world conditions. They're currently investing in trying to improve these simulation and testing tools.jumpingfish wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 08:00Ferrari need not only strategy team, since 2018 they bring updated detailes for car's floor but sometimes it doesn't work. Why? Their pre-calculations, simulations, wind tunnel testing show performance gains, but it doesn't work on the track? Are there any correlation error somewhere that weaken them during the season?
But they got to keep working. There's a second place on the teams standings, and they must learn what is wrong with this car, for not making the same mistake on the next year.falonso81 wrote: ↑17 Jul 2019, 11:39If I am not mistaken, Binotto said they found why the new floor is not working and they are fixing it. Don't know if it will appear in time for the next round or after the summer break. In the end, even if they fix it, there is no hope in catching Merc which is bringing a whole lot of upgrades at Hockenheim.
I think you missed my pointsantos wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 11:01The most popular driver on the most popular team. It would be good for Ferrari. I bet they would do even more money. But i don't think they need a better driver. They need a better car and be better at strategy. Leclerc gave everything he could on the quali and ended up third. Wich was a surprise for me when looking at the gap. Didn't expect them to be so close. But in the race, Red Bull would take at least the third from him.Big Mangalhit wrote: ↑15 Jul 2019, 16:35I think Ferrari really needs to throw everything to hire Hamilton. It doesn't even need to be as a driver, can be as a strategist TBH. He showed in Silverstone to be a better strategist inside his own car and with limited information than all of Ferrari pitwall
Don't say that Vettel is a medium driver. He won 4 titles. At the moment he his not ok. I belive he took a big hit in morality after Canada.
Oh gosh Lec and Ric. What a dream lineup!!! 100% agree on the commentGPR -A wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 18:44Alonso did not have a SF70H or SF71H at his disposal, both of which were sure shot championship winners. When they had a great driver, the equipment was weak and when they built the right equipment, the driver is weak.diffuser wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 18:25Alonso worked... the team failed him repeatedly back then. In his 5 years I don't remember him making 1 gaffe.f1universe wrote: ↑16 Jul 2019, 17:21
We will see if Leclerc still works after 5 years without a title.
Honestly LeClerc doesn't need anybody but Alonso would push him.
In the current context, Ricciardo would be the best choice for Ferrari and he has a clause in his contract that would allow him to leave Renault if Mercedes or Ferrari offer come by. Bottas has one lap pace, but is too weak in races and is a passenger in the on track battles. Ricciardo is equally fast on one lap and is fare more intelligent, clean and ruthless in on track battles.
First and foremost, Ferrari need to fix the problem of their strategists. They need to put people who can outsmart the competition with out-of-the box thinking in strategy and read the race in shrewd and aggressive manner. Their strategy team is too weak and so much centered on Vettel that they lose out on Leclerc, who is clearly the better driver. The amount of stupid disregard they have shown to Leclerc's overall quali/race strategy is downright ugly.
Once they get Ricciardo, they should have two high quality strategy teams to assist both their drivers, lead by a highly decisive leader as their chief strategist. Currently, they are way too weak.
They don't need Hamilton or Alonso or John Cena to lead them. If they can fix their fundamental efficiency problems, they can win the championships with Lec and Ric.