well as said i am confused now because i didn't expect them to use a spec 2 engine in Spa and Albon still taking 5th.
this shows how powerfull that engine really is
Albon was 81 secs behind, so really there was a loss of around 2 secs a lap. So i wouldnt say that the engine was proving too much power. Reliable? Yes, but bearing in mind the great chassis, the car still has a big HP deficiency.
That’s not fair, because he was battling throught the midfield. Curious, if he was on Norris position, how much behind (or close with the Mercs) he would have finished...
I'm not sure the gap is on power.Capharol wrote: ↑02 Sep 2019, 13:33then if they really used the spec 2 in Hungary and at Spa, i wonder how much power Spec 3 and 4 really has, and with this i don't mean these bogy numbers every site spits out
@Jambier every time they bring a new spec, numbers are swirling around that they have x hp more as the previous one .... so there must be a big gain lying around in these specs
Once Albon was in clean air, when he was 6 sec behind Perez, he drove 1.5 sec / round faster then before.Marti_EF3 wrote: ↑02 Sep 2019, 14:44That’s not fair, because he was battling throught the midfield. Curious, if he was on Norris position, how much behind (or close with the Mercs) he would have finished...
What is surprising is that the PU refuses to blow, it delivers less power, but with all that mileage and wear, it keeps working. Great HondaHPD wrote: ↑02 Sep 2019, 16:31Apparently, Spec 3 was used very aggressively in previous races. (Explains Horner)
They had to return to Specification 2 for this reason.
Tanabe: "Maybe it's the conditions or some other calibration. It's not just a degradation problem."
https://racingnews365.nl/horner-motorpr ... n-de-motor
Spec 2 (Correction of reliability problem)
Spec 3 (turbo upgrade)
Spec 4 (ICE improvement)
For this reason we do not see so much difference between Spec 2 and 3.
Mmm surely you are trolling. Just post the real data which is after the pitstop he was lapping the same times as leaders. So clearly the chassis is quite something but also the engine isnt bad in race trim. Alex as fast as Hamilton with spec 2.0 is amazing pace.
You forgot that he was on Softs while leClerc was on Medium? So what's that -1 sec per lap to LeClerc's/Hamilton's numbers for a true lap time to lap time compare?godlameroso wrote: ↑02 Sep 2019, 02:57There are some positives to take away from today. Honda's new power unit is a success, Albon was much quicker than Leclerc late race. If we assume Verstappen to be .3 seconds faster than Albon, which was a similar gap to Riccardo then it stands that once the new fuel is introduced the fight is seriously on. We may get our 5 victories.