Monza FP2 with the new engines for Gasly and Max. Kvyat and Albon I don't know. Spec 3 on Friday?
https://twitter.com/HondaRacingF1/statu ... 5388931073
https://www.crash.net/f1/news/928596/1/ ... ep-forward“Around Monza, the real lap time is hard to see because of the tow but my fastest lap was done on my own and it felt good. I definitely think this new engine is a good step forward and you can feel the extra power which is positive.
I believe the 2014 engine regs were Renault pushed. Merc just found a better way of extracting the performance.
Ferrari refused to do a 4 cylinder, none of them wanted it. Mercedes thought about it best, Ferrari did a normal sized turbo, Renault were too small and Honda after looking at the Mercedes unit for a year decided to go with a miniturboAlexf1 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 07:46Renault pushed the concept most, Therefore Mercedes only had to be in favour. Mercedes pushed the 6 instead of 4 cylinder ICE variant which they had been developing for a looooong time. No other manufacturer had such a mature power unit back then. Let alone the advanced 'diesel' combustion technique. And the more cylinders with that advantage the better.
The Ferrari was also too small. The turbine side. The spent many a token to alleviate that.izzy wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 09:15Ferrari refused to do a 4 cylinder, none of them wanted it. Mercedes thought about it best, Ferrari did a normal sized turbo, Renault were too small and Honda after looking at the Mercedes unit for a year decided to go with a miniturboAlexf1 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 07:46Renault pushed the concept most, Therefore Mercedes only had to be in favour. Mercedes pushed the 6 instead of 4 cylinder ICE variant which they had been developing for a looooong time. No other manufacturer had such a mature power unit back then. Let alone the advanced 'diesel' combustion technique. And the more cylinders with that advantage the better.
But now they're all converging and great mates, F1 is a huge love-in among the OEMs, Honda will have as much of a voice as any of them.
Yes and it was the next year before Ferrari could catch up wasn't it, but they did realise and fix it. But in the beginning it was all about Mercedes people, and nobody else, reading about mguH to K being unlimited, realising this could mean generating all over the track, and thinking "Mertrux baby!!"PlatinumZealot wrote: ↑09 Sep 2019, 21:00The Ferrari was also too small. The turbine side. The spent many a token to alleviate that.izzy wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 09:15Ferrari refused to do a 4 cylinder, none of them wanted it. Mercedes thought about it best, Ferrari did a normal sized turbo, Renault were too small and Honda after looking at the Mercedes unit for a year decided to go with a miniturbo
But now they're all converging and great mates, F1 is a huge love-in among the OEMs, Honda will have as much of a voice as any of them.
That should be some mapping issue then. Better to have all that issues now, and be well prepared for next year.Wouter wrote: ↑10 Sep 2019, 08:43Jos Verstappen told yesterday on TV that Max can fight for the win in Singapore, USA, Brazil, Suzuka and Mexico.
He also said that there will be another engine change.
It would be strange in Abu Dhabi, so only Sochi is left.
@Wazari has always talked about a change in Sochi. So that could all be true. So wait and see.
He also said: " There was something with Max during the race that prevented him from achieving the required top speed and the expected RPM. However, that has been solved for the next race. "
Yes, I think VW were the only ones pushing for a 4 pot.izzy wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 09:15Ferrari refused to do a 4 cylinder, none of them wanted it. Mercedes thought about it best, Ferrari did a normal sized turbo, Renault were too small and Honda after looking at the Mercedes unit for a year decided to go with a miniturboAlexf1 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 07:46Renault pushed the concept most, Therefore Mercedes only had to be in favour. Mercedes pushed the 6 instead of 4 cylinder ICE variant which they had been developing for a looooong time. No other manufacturer had such a mature power unit back then. Let alone the advanced 'diesel' combustion technique. And the more cylinders with that advantage the better.
But now they're all converging and great mates, F1 is a huge love-in among the OEMs, Honda will have as much of a voice as any of them.
I remember Mercedes to be in favor of a 4 cilinder concept also, afterall the current 2.0 powering the A45 and S-class was in development already. But probably engineers calculated the advantages of the split turbo and Mercedes switched sides and chose for a V6 also.izzy wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 09:15Ferrari refused to do a 4 cylinder, none of them wanted it. Mercedes thought about it best, Ferrari did a normal sized turbo, Renault were too small and Honda after looking at the Mercedes unit for a year decided to go with a miniturboAlexf1 wrote: ↑07 Sep 2019, 07:46Renault pushed the concept most, Therefore Mercedes only had to be in favour. Mercedes pushed the 6 instead of 4 cylinder ICE variant which they had been developing for a looooong time. No other manufacturer had such a mature power unit back then. Let alone the advanced 'diesel' combustion technique. And the more cylinders with that advantage the better.
But now they're all converging and great mates, F1 is a huge love-in among the OEMs, Honda will have as much of a voice as any of them.