donskar wrote:Full disclosure: I'm a tifosi and have been for 40+ years.
Each of the two contenders -- Massa and Hamilton -- had to accomplish a difficult but straight forward task:
1) Massa had to win the race; drive mistake free on track and in the pits, and he had to do so in wet conditions, where he has proven (Silverstone) to be more than a little inconsistent
Massa succeeded completely. A great drive in every way. =D>
2) In the closing stages, Hamilton had to do ONE thing to win the WDC - he had to hold off Vettel, then failing to do so, pass Vettel. Hamilton failed. He won the WDC, NOT through his own efforts, but through Glock's failure.
Hamilton deserved the WDC =D>, he broke no rules, did not cheat, did not drive carelessly or dangerously. But the way he won the championship - through Glock - leaves a bitter taste.
I'll start out by saying that I'm not really that passionate about any one team or driver anymore, I just love the sport - mostly the technology I guess.
I agree with just about all of what you usually post, but to say that glock has you left with a bitter taste I think is a bit unwarranted. Both teams have had their share of hiccups throughout the season. Glock didn't have anything to do with Massas refueling mishap, or his numerous spins in the wet. Glock didnt have anything to do with the Ferrari engine letting him down 3 laps from a victory. Glock didn't have anything to do with Massa being #2 to Raikkonen to start the season. Massa just plain outclassing the reigning world champion - in a ferrari pulling no punches about team orders no less - to take the #1 spot is a great achievement to begin with.
If you take a look at the lap times on the last lap, you will see that Glock and Trulli (the only cars in the top 10 with dry tires fixed) both ran 1:44's. To say that glock failed is a bit harsh. He took the gamble to climb the grid and he lost. If he did take wet tires like anyone else, Glock would be nowhere near P5 Vettel or Hamilton. I actually think its the other way around. If Glock wanted to hand Hamilton the championship on a silver platter, he would've stopped for tires.
I think once you let it sink in a bit (trust me, I can't believe the last 45 seconds of this race either!) you'll be a bit more objective. Hamilton did not win the championship on the last corner to one driver, or even in the last race. You win a championship over the course of the whole season. Unfortunately for Massa, he drove a great season but came up a hair short over the entire schedule.
I guess I also don't agree with your criticism of Speed TV coverage either! I think those guys are great. You've got bob the professional, david hobbs is pretty funny most of the time, and matchet brings a bit of the technical side to light for the newcomers, although I think he's missing out that the majority of the audience already knows most of his stuff. I think windsor is pretty funny as well and kinda ties it all together because he's actually at the race. To each his own I guess.
-f