A few things,Manoah2u wrote: ↑30 Sep 2019, 11:40Vettel had a magnificent start, as he said himself, he would have had LeClerc easy.
I rather doubt LeClerc 'gave' him slipstream, i mean come on, it's not like he's got a lever to pull to stop it.
Any car gets slipstream like that. Look at even the Mclaren overtaking Hamilton.
Immediately after Vettel passed LeClerc he blazed off in the distance with no way that LeClerc could keep up.
I was actually pleased to see 'classic' Vettel back.
Hilarious, thanks for the laughF1Krof wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 11:44Don't worry, it will the their easiest race for Ferrari's. There is little to no degradation on this track. Even though it has two long straights it is very hard to overtake as the last sector is very twisty, a good traction out of the last corner will suffice to cover the position.
And as for Mercedes' strategy starting on Meds is no feat of advantageous strategy, its just they're desperately trying something different as they have no alternative. The tires will not play any role here, even if they do, going Soft - Medium towards the end its better because you can push the Meds without worry. So yeah, its gonna be a Ferrari one two, it's just a shame that my bookie doesn't have F1 quotes
Yea Bahrain is definitely good race to take into account.Mandrake wrote: ↑30 Sep 2019, 14:10The whole attempt at Ferrari to pamper both drivers is ridiculous. They made Vettel no1 which LeClerc was totally fine with (said by himself) only to ignore all orders starting in Bahrain already. The sense of entitlement LEC is having right now is also dangerous as he might be quicker in Qualy right now, but the difference in actual race pace is significantly less than say between BOT and HAM.
Then the theoretical playthroughs of this start and how to behave......that's BS. Both Vettel and LeClerc had way better starts than Hamilton due to the tire advantage, so Vettel would have led into T2 even if Charles had covered the inside. It was only about if there would have been enough space given between the cars.
According to AMuS LeClerc both in Singapore and Sotchi opted for a more aggressive setup in Quali at the expense of longevity in the race. That that with whatever pinch of salt, but AMuS were very critical about Vettel recently, so I doubt it's made up. And I believe it showed in the race. When LEC was given the order to push he made no gains on Vettel. He was 4 secs behind so not impeded by Vettel in any way. Also I doubt that his tires were shot as in the closing stages of the race he was able to go much quicker fighting for the fastest lap.
Ferrari are shooting themselves in the foot massively at the moment both for this season and in the preparation for next season.....
I guess a lot of you folks Don't Understand The Clue Here.
Not really. Ferrari is 2nd in standing and thats how its gonna remain. Vettel is -21pts 5 races before end of the season with 9 qualis in a row on losing side.Zarathustra wrote: ↑30 Sep 2019, 14:44I guess a lot of you folks Don't Understand The Clue Here.
Vettel didn't receive any Karma yesterday- it was Ferrari who received all the Karma they deserve.
It's just repulsive how Ferrari is handling this situation- I lost a lot of respect for the team yesterday.
they could easily arrange things to remove stopped cars without putting a crane out, quite often. They could just winch them, a lot of the time, if only they had a rope!!El Scorchio wrote: ↑30 Sep 2019, 13:19I don't really like VSC, (they could refine it in some ways to keep the timings neutral or do it slightly differently) but we all know it's there to try and lessen the possibility of another Bianchi incident. And you have to ask yourself is it worse that X driver benefits over Y driver, or that someone else (be it driver or steward) maybe loses their life?
He beat vettel(F3 I think), but Hamilton beat him and was picked over him, so he wants vettel to look better, making himself look better.TAG wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 15:20It's pretty hilarious to listen to him squirm. Anyone know the root of his acrimony?Restomaniac wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 14:56He was then trying to convince himself that LeClerc could still win after his last pitstop.
‘LeClerc can still win.........’.
Yeah, they should just put grass, gravel and land mines at that corner so we don't have to ever hear Kmag stupidity again. If there was gravel there he would have lost all his points, rather than the 1 point he lost for a justified penalty.
Don't know about Ted, but from both of their team radios its pretty damning. There was a deal - Leclerc has done as agreed, Vettel didn't. He didn't want to give place back multiple time, and obviously in clean air and Leclerc following him for 9 laps under 1.5s, he would likely have advantage.Big Tea wrote: ↑30 Sep 2019, 15:15The way it comes over on Ted's notebook ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jkp6k6fRmmE around 7 min) is not that it was a driver agreement but that the team decided it.
It makes Vettel's reaction slightly more understandable then as he perhaps just went along rather than actively agreed.
Nonsense, VET crashed into SEN, had nothing to do with WEB, that is just another case of VET trying to shift blame for his many mistakes to others.izzy wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 18:31Multi21 happened because Webber was aggressive with Seb in Brazil when Seb had the championship on the line, the previous year. It carried over because the team didn't do anything but left the drivers to it.
So it's 100% relevant to a team with two drivers needing managing. the team has to be in control, so the drivers have confidence that things will be fair, even though the other guy is a beastly racing driver
You just don't get it do you? With a reversed grid, it wouldn't just be LEC behind BOT and HAM, BOT and HAM would also be behind slower cars and would be forced to overtake them while defending. IT WOULD NOT BE THE SAME.Just_a_fan wrote: ↑29 Sep 2019, 19:33Re: the VSC thing. S'funny how it put the guy in the fastest car behind slower cars which should have resulted in exciting overtaking / racing. But it didn't. People then annoyed because the VSC "robbed" a driver of a win. And yet people want to have races effectively decided by just this type of fast-behind-slow situation.