Touchélittlebigcat wrote: ↑25 Oct 2019, 15:21Sorry, what is the button on the steering wheel often marked as PIT or PL? Isn't that a preselected gear and rev limit to aid the driver?
Or the operation of the PU individual elements... i can understand the PU torque as a function of pedal position, but at full throttle the CE dictates PU operation (energy strategy) based on a preset algorithm.... driver aid?
I've never been a particular fan of Cyril, but I seem to agree with him;subcritical71 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 02:19
Or the operation of the PU individual elements... i can understand the PU torque as a function of pedal position, but at full throttle the CE dictates PU operation (energy strategy) based on a preset algorithm.... driver aid?
"It's a driver aid, just like as we said before a number of things are driver aids – I'll give you one, energy deployment. It's all lap distance based. At some point you need to accept that there's an element of subjectivity."
I posted that ages ago on this thread but nobody acknowledged it.
Indeed. And the question arises what torque level matches 100% accelerator. Is it ICE torque with the higher levels introduced by the ECU as it judged they are needed? Or e-boost with the ECU reducing power to save energy? Or some mystical in between. Whatever it is something happens such that the driver is not unaided.subcritical71 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 02:19Or the operation of the PU individual elements... i can understand the PU torque as a function of pedal position, but at full throttle the CE dictates PU operation (energy strategy) based on a preset algorithm.... driver aid?
Which further makes this a joke. At least 5 years running an “illegal” system and your only excluded from one race!gridwalker wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 14:07Grosjean: Illegal Renault system in use since 2015
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/gros ... st=organic
Somebody needs to protest DRS. I mean, if ever there was a driver aid meant to diminish the skill of the driver, it’s DRS. Sure it’s allowed by the technical regulations, but as a driver aid it’s against the sporting regulations!subcritical71 wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 14:44Which further makes this a joke. At least 5 years running an “illegal” system and your only excluded from one race!gridwalker wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 14:07Grosjean: Illegal Renault system in use since 2015
https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/gros ... st=organic
While I can agree with the power steering, the PU at 100% pedal position is not 100% PU output. And this is not under the drivers control, the K and / or H have strategies which change based on track position as well as strat modes. Essentially the same argument as the brake bias. If you want to male it driver aid-less the driver would have to adjust the deployment/harvest by way of physical input. While I think that would abide by the sporting regs, I would hate to see the driver playing steering wheel olympics (adjusting strat modes / deployment strategy / brake bias / diff settings / drs / radio / shifting / etc.) between corners and not racing.littlebigcat wrote: ↑26 Oct 2019, 18:09I interpret a driver aid as something that directly changes an input from the driver. So powersteering isn't because it doesn't change how much or little a driver is turning based on the input. The power unit mapping of the ICE,MGU-K and MGU-H isn't an aid because it doesn't change the input into the power unit, 100% throttle is still 100% throttle, just the map changes how that 100% throttle is interpreted by the three systems of the power unit.
Pit limiter is most definitely a driver aid and also breaks rule 5.7 of the tech regs so, I don't know what the hell the FIA are all about really.