Maybe that's why I'm not in F1 design.
So, they only use that floor for 2 laps? How much data could they have after a couple of installation laps?... The change was really quick though.f1rules wrote:According to mclaren.com norris was initially using the test floor with light measuremnt underneath that sainz stopped on track with in suzuka, and it said no new items, but they could offcourse be lying, but thats why norris had a floor change
If it's flowvis then that's sufficient. It could be a floor that pushes the limits a little closer to stall conditions to check correlation between CFD/wind tunnel and reality. Basically checking how accurate their simulation models are to the real world. For a very general example, If the team finds out that their simulation models are on the conservative side then they know that perhaps they can push future aerodynamic designs harder for more downforce.SmallSoldier wrote: ↑25 Oct 2019, 19:45So, they only use that floor for 2 laps? How much data could they have after a couple of installation laps?... The change was really quick though.f1rules wrote:According to mclaren.com norris was initially using the test floor with light measuremnt underneath that sainz stopped on track with in suzuka, and it said no new items, but they could offcourse be lying, but thats why norris had a floor change
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Or they have more downforce which induces more drag that requires more power to maintain the speed...