Please leave this forum if you have nothing else to postgokarter wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:01unbelievable with all the support from Ferrari International Assistance like Bernie mentioned https://autoweek.com/article/formula-on ... vantage-f1. ferrari still cant get other stuff of motoracing right . another funny pit stop botch. the only thing they have going for them is their illegal qualy engine that Ferrari international assistance just ignores because that their job
Max should have given the position back to Magnussen when he overtook him off track. There was no investigation whatsoever. I’m telling that because it’s a driver from your favorite team which should have been investigated, but “Ferrari International Assistance” let them go.gokarter wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:01unbelievable with all the support from Ferrari International Assistance like Bernie mentioned https://autoweek.com/article/formula-on ... vantage-f1. ferrari still cant get other stuff of motoracing right . another funny pit stop botch. the only thing they have going for them is their illegal qualy engine that Ferrari international assistance just ignores because that their job
It would be nice, if you could send some sources as well. Where did you see or read that Binotto is expecting a protest?
Look on the Autosport main news page.LM10 wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:51It would be nice, if you could send some sources as well. Where did you see or read that Binotto is expecting a protest?
Also, I asked you yesterday about the forums where some people suggest that Mercedes and Honda know what Ferrari is doing with their PU and suggest that Toto told they want to implement it to their car and Honda wants to protest or something like that. That’s what you posted. So my question again: Which forums and which sources do these people rely on?
Autosport are hardly a reliable source, pretty much a motorsport tabloid.djones wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:53Look on the Autosport main news page.LM10 wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:51It would be nice, if you could send some sources as well. Where did you see or read that Binotto is expecting a protest?
Also, I asked you yesterday about the forums where some people suggest that Mercedes and Honda know what Ferrari is doing with their PU and suggest that Toto told they want to implement it to their car and Honda wants to protest or something like that. That’s what you posted. So my question again: Which forums and which sources do these people rely on?
Then look on Reddit and Autosport forums for the talk about the Honda and Merc knowledge.
I don't want to post links to other forums and sites as I once got told off for it by a mod.
Just looked up the article on the main page. Autosport quoted Binotto telling that they would be happy about a protest to finally clear their name and show how stupid the accusations are.3jawchuck wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:59Autosport are hardly a reliable source, pretty much a motorsport tabloid.djones wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:53Look on the Autosport main news page.LM10 wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 23:51
It would be nice, if you could send some sources as well. Where did you see or read that Binotto is expecting a protest?
Also, I asked you yesterday about the forums where some people suggest that Mercedes and Honda know what Ferrari is doing with their PU and suggest that Toto told they want to implement it to their car and Honda wants to protest or something like that. That’s what you posted. So my question again: Which forums and which sources do these people rely on?
Then look on Reddit and Autosport forums for the talk about the Honda and Merc knowledge.
I don't want to post links to other forums and sites as I once got told off for it by a mod.
Post the links, you will be fine because they are on topic.
Think of the ES like a 4L bucket.saviour stivala wrote: ↑27 Oct 2019, 06:09Energy store (ES) art 1.27. The difference between the maximum and the minimum stat of charge of the ES may not exceed 4MJ ‘at any time’ the car is on track.
To my mind the above simply means that 4MJ is the maximum that is allowed either to be extracted or returned to the ES ‘at any time’ the car is on track.
Returning 6MJ to the ES and extracting 6 MJ from the ES and splitting it 4MJ to ‘K’ and 2MJ to ‘H’ will exceed the “4MJ at any time the car is on track” rules. This is different from being able to ‘top-up’ the maximum permitted 4MJ for more than one time while the car is on track and or over one lap.
I wish some team would still open an investigation just cause I'm interested in some official information instead of remaining in this nebulous state.TEHNOS wrote: ↑28 Oct 2019, 18:10Quote
I speak to an official who has knowledge of the engine’s workings.
They tell me that after the FIA inspected the system with the full co-operation of Ferrari, there were no discernible high pressure points within the system from which fluids could leak. Three distinctly different liquids are used for cooling.
The question of how Ferrari is achieving its prodigious power output therefore remains. It’s a matter their rivals will be anxious to get to the bottom of in order to close the gap before the start of the 2020 F1 season.
https://www.racefans.net/2019/10/28/pad ... ay-four-2/