No but trying to be co2 neutral
I caught that as well, hopefully it is a sign for the FIA to clean up their act and stop this "let them crash" nonsense.RZS10 wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 19:58Funny how the exact moment she says "fairer" they show the controversial moment when Max rammed Leclerc off track
https://youtu.be/epdmatdvSzk
Airbags add weight but make up for it by increased safety, same with the safety systems in F1.
All the manufacturers know that there isn't a single answer to the needs of the future. So electric cars are one part of the solution but also finding fuels which are sustainable; renewables that can also provide part of the solution. I mean, there are a billion fuel-powered cars on this planet and we're not gonna get rid of them in the next two years. So we have to find other solutions. And I think Formula One can be a really strong figure-head in terms of finding us those solutions and promoting us those solutions and publicising those solutions, because there won't be one solution to the challenges we face. So in a way, I'm glad we didn't change the engines that much, because we're now presenting the power unit suppliers with a new challenge, which is to provide solutions to our problem.
Symonds said that they were looking into carbon ceramic and that iron rotors would be too heavy.littlebigcat wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 21:19Pat's response to Peter Windsor about the brakes was great too. They are really thinking about the environmental impacts and how they can address it
I wonder if they are going to go further down that route and looking at bio resins
Champ cars were always heavier that F1 but having 900hp meant they were still exciting to watch and the fact that they could race pretty close together (even on street circuits) made for great racing.
Yes but he also mentioned the particulates from the braking with regards to the environment.ENGINE TUNER wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 21:30Symonds said that they were looking into carbon ceramic and that iron rotors would be too heavy.
Yes, will the carbon ceramic material eliminate or greatly reduce those particulates?littlebigcat wrote: ↑01 Nov 2019, 00:25Yes but he also mentioned the particulates from the braking with regards to the environment.ENGINE TUNER wrote: ↑31 Oct 2019, 21:30Symonds said that they were looking into carbon ceramic and that iron rotors would be too heavy.
Don't you just take CO2 out of the atmosphere while producing dry ice? Resulting in net zero CO2 added to the atmosphere.
That is not why they use the dry ice, it is used for a "performance advantage". They wouldn't burst into flames.marmer wrote: ↑01 Nov 2019, 14:01The dry ice situation is embarrassing the cars should be able to sit on the grid with the engine off without cooking themselves. Personally I wouldn't allow any kind of cooling or heating to the car they should be designed to cope with demands of being stationary without bursting into flames