When you observe HAM setting personal bests on like his 5th attempt, that’s usually a not-so-subtle clue that the car is getting lighter (as opposed to the tires being magical).
oooh, so the theory they're testing is whether Ferrari are somehow syncing fuel delivery with the FIA measurement sampling frequency, to deliver some extra in between samples. Now FIA have said that's illegal, so now the others are watching to see if the Ferrari power is reduced tomorrow. If not, they can cross that conspiracy theory off their list and move on to the next one. Lovely!!F1NAC wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:20Here we go again
https://mobile.twitter.com/tgruener/sta ... 5483430912
How so, FIA can’t detect that so If that is it it is game on.izzy wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:33oooh, so the theory they're testing is whether Ferrari are somehow syncing fuel delivery with the FIA measurement sampling frequency, to deliver some extra in between samples. Now FIA have said that's illegal, so now the others are watching to see if the Ferrari power is reduced tomorrow. If not, they can cross that conspiracy theory off their list and move on to the next one. Lovely!!F1NAC wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:20Here we go again
https://mobile.twitter.com/tgruener/sta ... 5483430912
Yes I agree, as per my previous post. Genuine question, why? Is there an advantage? Aren’t you going to notice set-up issues earlier when you go as quick as possible.
fairly clever thoF1NAC wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:20Here we go again
https://mobile.twitter.com/tgruener/sta ... 5483430912
Well, so far it was just a question about fuel flow measurement to get a clarification. FIA told that it’s not legal to let more fuel flow in the intervals it is not measured. Now they know it’s illegal and if Ferrari still is that fast on the straights today, they will know that Ferrari’s secret can’t be tricking the fuel flow limit.F1NAC wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:20Here we go again
https://mobile.twitter.com/tgruener/sta ... 5483430912
We’re definitely on the same page.Restomaniac wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:30Indeed. Obviously some also think Norris’ 3rd place is genuine too.
yes the assumption is that Ferrari won't risk flatly breaking a rule, isn't it. But perhaps FIA could see it in the code? They have access to all the code don't they and the standard ECU is part of thatSieper wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:35How so, FIA can’t detect that so If that is it it is game on.izzy wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:33oooh, so the theory they're testing is whether Ferrari are somehow syncing fuel delivery with the FIA measurement sampling frequency, to deliver some extra in between samples. Now FIA have said that's illegal, so now the others are watching to see if the Ferrari power is reduced tomorrow. If not, they can cross that conspiracy theory off their list and move on to the next one. Lovely!!
The teams seem to play these games sometimes. Whether there’s an advantage in it, and what it is (beyond shock and awe once true pace is revealed) . . . who knows.Sieper wrote: ↑02 Nov 2019, 21:37Yes I agree, as per my previous post. Genuine question, why? Is there an advantage? Aren’t you going to notice set-up issues earlier when you go as quick as possible.