This might be the mindset Hamilton was talking about in Mexico, where he was saying he is giving Verstappen more room then an other driver.Wass85 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:17Leclerc comprised his last few corners with Max after defending against Lewis. Lewis though should have fully closed the door on Max instead of making a half hearted attempt.siskue2005 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:09Yup leclerc defended heavily on Lewis but let pass max so easily in the final corner
Yes maybe so and this is where I believe Max unnerves Lewis like no other driver on the grid and forces mistakes from the champion.turbof1 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:18This might be the mindset Hamilton was talking about in Mexico, where he was saying he is giving Verstappen more room then an other driver.Wass85 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:17Leclerc comprised his last few corners with Max after defending against Lewis. Lewis though should have fully closed the door on Max instead of making a half hearted attempt.siskue2005 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:09
Yup leclerc defended heavily on Lewis but let pass max so easily in the final corner
Not saying that is a right or wrong approach, just saying it looks like Hamilton did it with intent.
Safety cars and tyre choice. And maybe a bit of genius.
They probably could not get the car into neutral or whatever, which required a crane to get on track. As you said it would have highely unlikely that a race car would get into that area, let alone near the crane, but I think this is a standard procedure since the accident of Bianchi.dans79 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:28Can we talk about the inconsistencies of safety car usage.
In Austin we had kmag directly in the firing line at the end of the Strait and all we got was double waved yellows.
Bottas pulls off in a section of the track that would require another driver to break the laws of physics to even potentially hit him and we get a full safety car.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
It makes perfect sense when you realise F1 is a show and not a sport.dans79 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:28Can we talk about the inconsistencies of safety car usage.
In Austin we had kmag directly in the firing line at the end of the Strait and all we got was double waved yellows.
Bottas pulls off in a section of the track that would require another driver to break the laws of physics to even potentially hit him and we get a full safety car.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
you need to look at the FIA siteproteus wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:26What gets me most, is how official F1 site is unable to provide who is under investigation about yellow flags. Is it a secret? How can they provide transparency of their work, if they are not telling the people what are they doing. They have the data, they even have video footage, but they refuse to show anything.
it makes sense because they couldn't move the cardans79 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:28Can we talk about the inconsistencies of safety car usage.
In Austin we had kmag directly in the firing line at the end of the Strait and all we got was double waved yellows.
Bottas pulls off in a section of the track that would require another driver to break the laws of physics to even potentially hit him and we get a full safety car.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
A crane had to be brought onto the track to remove Bottas' car. The moment a crane has to be used necessitates a full safety car. They were just following procedure.turbof1 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:34They probably could not get the car into neutral or whatever, which required a crane to get on track. As you said it would have highely unlikely that a race car would get into that area, let alone near the crane, but I think this is a standard procedure since the accident of Bianchi.dans79 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:28Can we talk about the inconsistencies of safety car usage.
In Austin we had kmag directly in the firing line at the end of the Strait and all we got was double waved yellows.
Bottas pulls off in a section of the track that would require another driver to break the laws of physics to even potentially hit him and we get a full safety car.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
Though this is conjecture from me. I agree I also felt a SC was unnecessary.
I could understand a virtual safety car.turbof1 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:34They probably could not get the car into neutral or whatever, which required a crane to get on track. As you said it would have highely unlikely that a race car would get into that area, let alone near the crane, but I think this is a standard procedure since the accident of Bianchi.dans79 wrote: ↑17 Nov 2019, 22:28Can we talk about the inconsistencies of safety car usage.
In Austin we had kmag directly in the firing line at the end of the Strait and all we got was double waved yellows.
Bottas pulls off in a section of the track that would require another driver to break the laws of physics to even potentially hit him and we get a full safety car.
It makes no sense whatsoever.
Though this is conjecture from me. I agree I also felt a SC was unnecessary.