I don't see a problem for Ricciardo if he goes to Ferrari. Think he would be a great partner for LeClerc. Ferrari would give him the opportunity to win if he was good enough.
I don't see a problem for Ricciardo if he goes to Ferrari. Think he would be a great partner for LeClerc. Ferrari would give him the opportunity to win if he was good enough.
They were the best in Brazil ... the only guy that could have given Max a run for his money in the race was LeClerc but he had a PU penalty.loner wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 20:45i wounder if Mark Hughs will bet again that Ferrari will be dynamite through Yas marina sector 2.I’m betting they’re going to be dynamite through sector three at Interlagos.
http://static.carthrottle.com/workspace ... 8e9785.jpg
Sector 1 TIME 1 16 Charles LECLERC 17.417 2 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 17.425 3 5 Sebastian VETTEL 17.462 4 44 Lewis HAMILTON 17.532 5 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 17.621 6 23 Alexander ALBON 17.631
Sector 2 TIME 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 34.195 44 Lewis HAMILTON 34.248 16 Charles LECLERC 34.265 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 34.330 5 Sebastian VETTEL 34.346 23 Alexander ALBON 34.384
Sector 3 TIME 16 Charles LECLERC 15.804 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 15.817 44 Lewis HAMILTON 15.819 5 Sebastian VETTEL 15.823 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 15.827
https://www.planetf1.com/news/fia-seize ... el-system/The Ferrari engine controversy is refusing to die down with the FIA reportedly seizing “parts of the fuel system” from the SF90 as well as a customer.
Following a string of pole positions after the summer break, Ferrari’s rivals wrote to the FIA asking for clarification regarding the power units.
Ok, you made your point. Please stop now with the baiting and sarcasm. The underlying point was fine.Capharol wrote: ↑18 Nov 2019, 12:08again pls do so, a contender less for WDC & WCCselvam_e2002 wrote: ↑18 Nov 2019, 05:52to handle this situation, bring back Alonso that is the only choice for ferrari.
ain't no dynamite i can see.diffuser wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 22:25They were the best in Brazil ... the only guy that could have given Max a run for his money in the race was LeClerc but he had a PU penalty.loner wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 20:45i wounder if Mark Hughs will bet again that Ferrari will be dynamite through Yas marina sector 2.I’m betting they’re going to be dynamite through sector three at Interlagos.
http://static.carthrottle.com/workspace ... 8e9785.jpg
Sector 1 TIME 1 16 Charles LECLERC 17.417 2 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 17.425 3 5 Sebastian VETTEL 17.462 4 44 Lewis HAMILTON 17.532 5 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 17.621 6 23 Alexander ALBON 17.631Sector 2 TIME 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 34.195 44 Lewis HAMILTON 34.248 16 Charles LECLERC 34.265 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 34.330 5 Sebastian VETTEL 34.346 23 Alexander ALBON 34.384Sector 3 TIME 16 Charles LECLERC 15.804 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 15.817 44 Lewis HAMILTON 15.819 5 Sebastian VETTEL 15.823 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 15.827
Big Audio dynamite!!loner wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 13:48ain't no dynamite i can see.diffuser wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 22:25They were the best in Brazil ... the only guy that could have given Max a run for his money in the race was LeClerc but he had a PU penalty.loner wrote: ↑19 Nov 2019, 20:45
i wounder if Mark Hughs will bet again that Ferrari will be dynamite through Yas marina sector 2.
http://static.carthrottle.com/workspace ... 8e9785.jpg
Sector 1 TIME 1 16 Charles LECLERC 17.417 2 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 17.425 3 5 Sebastian VETTEL 17.462 4 44 Lewis HAMILTON 17.532 5 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 17.621 6 23 Alexander ALBON 17.631Sector 2 TIME 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 34.195 44 Lewis HAMILTON 34.248 16 Charles LECLERC 34.265 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 34.330 5 Sebastian VETTEL 34.346 23 Alexander ALBON 34.384Sector 3 TIME 16 Charles LECLERC 15.804 77 Valtteri BOTTAS 15.817 44 Lewis HAMILTON 15.819 5 Sebastian VETTEL 15.823 33 Max VERSTAPPEN 15.827
Redbull had the slimmest or second-slimmest (after Toro Rosso) rear wing in Brazil. Ferrari, on the other hand, had the biggest rear wing of all. Maybe you should check some pictures again. Of course this is going to affect top speed significantly because there is no other part on the car adding more drag than the rear wing.Jambier wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 22:48Regarding performance, Ferrari told that they are now as quick as Red Bull even in low grip low speed.
This is a change in their philosophy since several race, adding more downforce.
We can see that with that kind of setup, they are matching RB in corner, but also they aren't fastest than RB in straights.
No, we cant see that, because they're still not matching RB in corners at all. In brazil for example they were slower in every corner on the track. The slower the corner, the more they were losing.Jambier wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 22:48Regarding performance, Ferrari told that they are now as quick as Red Bull even in low grip low speed.
This is a change in their philosophy since several race, adding more downforce.
We can see that with that kind of setup, they are matching RB in corner, but also they aren't fastest than RB in straights.
Jambier wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 22:48Regarding performance, Ferrari told that they are now as quick as Red Bull even in low grip low speed.
This is a change in their philosophy since several race, adding more downforce.
We can see that with that kind of setup, they are matching RB in corner, but also they aren't fastest than RB in straights.
If you think they had the fastest car in the races you clearly have not paid attention. The only times they could convert pole positions into race wins were in Belgium and Italy and if you remember it was only due to the long straights which made Leclerc hold position even though Mercedes was right at his gearbox for several laps.Wass85 wrote: ↑21 Nov 2019, 10:53Jambier wrote: ↑20 Nov 2019, 22:48Regarding performance, Ferrari told that they are now as quick as Red Bull even in low grip low speed.
This is a change in their philosophy since several race, adding more downforce.
We can see that with that kind of setup, they are matching RB in corner, but also they aren't fastest than RB in straights.
But why would they change their philosophy when at one point they comfortably had the fastest car, especially in qualifying.